Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Mention ding-libs in BUILD.txt

2010-10-26 Thread Sumit Bose
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 02:00:37PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/26/2010 12:43 PM, Sumit Bose wrote: > > Hi, > > > > this patch add some comments about ding-libs to BUILD.txt and should fix > > ticket #651. > > > Nack. > > Please re

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Mention ding-libs in BUILD.txt

2010-10-26 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/26/2010 12:43 PM, Sumit Bose wrote: > Hi, > > this patch add some comments about ding-libs to BUILD.txt and should fix > ticket #651. Nack. Please remove the section "How to build components individually" as it is no longer accurate. - --

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Allow authentication for referrals

2010-10-26 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/26/2010 12:02 PM, Sumit Bose wrote: > Hi, > > this patch add a rebind proc which uses the same credentials used for > the primary server to authenticate to the second server when doing > referral chasing. > > There are two important things to k

[SSSD] [PATCH] Mention ding-libs in BUILD.txt

2010-10-26 Thread Sumit Bose
Hi, this patch add some comments about ding-libs to BUILD.txt and should fix ticket #651. bye, Sumit From eca2860f86fe8528c9e4e4b77eb5d847926fd0fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sumit Bose Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:39:40 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Mention ding-libs in BUILD.txt --- BUILD.txt |

[SSSD] [PATCH] Allow authentication for referrals

2010-10-26 Thread Sumit Bose
Hi, this patch add a rebind proc which uses the same credentials used for the primary server to authenticate to the second server when doing referral chasing. There are two important things to keep in mind: - as already mentioned we use the same credentials for both connections, i.e. if TLS is

Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] Fixes for nss responder

2010-10-26 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/26/2010 07:51 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 10/25/2010 09:51 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: >> Hi, > >> if an nss provider dies during a request the nss responders dies due to >> a double free error minutes after the request was sent. The responder >

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Always use uint32_t for UID/GID numbers (master)

2010-10-26 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/26/2010 07:42 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 10/26/2010 06:08 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> On 10/25/2010 07:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>> On 10/25/2010 12:36 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: On 10/25/2010 04:12 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>>

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Minor improvements to the prerelease S/RPM builds

2010-10-26 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/2010 03:49 PM, Sumit Bose wrote: > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 02:05:11PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I'm doing some work to get the automated builds working again in the > post-ding_libs world. This is just a minor patch to the Makefile to

Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] Fixes for nss responder

2010-10-26 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/2010 09:51 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: > Hi, > > if an nss provider dies during a request the nss responders dies due to > a double free error minutes after the request was sent. The responder > does not handle the unfinished request and so they st

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Always use uint32_t for UID/GID numbers (master)

2010-10-26 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/26/2010 06:08 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > On 10/25/2010 07:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On 10/25/2010 12:36 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >>> On 10/25/2010 04:12 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 10/25/2010 09:44 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > As

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Always use uint32_t for UID/GID numbers (master)

2010-10-26 Thread Jakub Hrozek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/2010 07:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 10/25/2010 12:36 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> On 10/25/2010 04:12 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>> On 10/25/2010 09:44 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: As discovered by QA, we were not consistent across a