-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/06/2011 03:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 01/06/2011 09:20 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>> in trac ticket #751 it was requested to add syslog messages telling the
>> admin why access was denied for a specific user with LDAP access
>> pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/06/2011 02:38 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 01/06/2011 07:22 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>>> This new patch converts the obfuscated password at startup and replaces
>>> it with the cleartext version in the option array. This should fix
>>> https://
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/06/2011 02:10 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 01/06/2011 06:11 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> 0002: should fix #757. If only the local provider was configured the
> code did not return to the main loop during execution and the callback
> o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/06/2011 09:20 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in trac ticket #751 it was requested to add syslog messages telling the
> admin why access was denied for a specific user with LDAP access
> provider.
>
> The following two patches add this for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/06/2011 07:22 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>> This new patch converts the obfuscated password at startup and replaces
>> it with the cleartext version in the option array. This should fix
>> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/761 and
>> https://fedora
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/06/2011 06:11 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
0002: should fix #757. If only the local provider was configured the
code did not return to the main loop during execution and the callback
of the corresponding tevent request was never called.I
Hi,
in trac ticket #751 it was requested to add syslog messages telling the
admin why access was denied for a specific user with LDAP access
provider.
The following two patches add this for the check based on the shadow
expire attribute and the authorized service check.
bye,
Sumit
From 31d15a605
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/06/2011 08:36 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>
>>
>>> 0001--INI-Making-Coverity-happy.patch <- this is the patch I submitted
>>> earlier that I merged by mistake. I was supposed to merge it with patch
>>> 25 but picked the wrong one instead.
>>> Patch 2
>
> > 0001--INI-Making-Coverity-happy.patch <- this is the patch I submitted
> > earlier that I merged by mistake. I was supposed to merge it with patch
> > 25 but picked the wrong one instead.
> > Patch 25 addresses the real issue found by Coverity as mentioned in
> > Stephen's review mail but i
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 01/06/2011 03:02 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 04:03:38PM -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> >> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >>> On 01/05/2011 03:40 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> 0003--BUILD-Allow-trace-per-component.patch <- This patch allows
> > trac
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 08:31:57AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/05/2011 06:12 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Shanks found an issue with obfuscated password which led to
> > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/762
> >
> > This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/06/2011 03:02 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 04:03:38PM -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> On 01/05/2011 03:40 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
0003--BUILD-Allow-trace-per-component.patch <- This patch allows
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 12:08:01PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/04/2011 08:18 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > based on an issue found by Shanks (#757) I had a closer look at some
> > parts of the enumeration code in the nss resp
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 04:03:38PM -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On 01/05/2011 03:40 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> > > 0003--BUILD-Allow-trace-per-component.patch <- This patch allows
> > >> tracing
> > > per component
> > Nack. Requiring a file doesn't make sense.
14 matches
Mail list logo
