On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:59:16 -0500
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -subreq = sdap_get_initgr_send(state, state->ev,
> +subreq = sdap_get_initgr_send(state,
> + state->ev,
>state->ctx->be->domain,
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patch 0001: Add the user's primary group to the initgroups lookup
The user may not be a direct member of their primary group, but
we still want to make sure that group is cached on the system.
Patch 0002: Perform initgroups lookup for PAM
Previously w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 07:50 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 01/19/2011 07:42 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:49:26AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On 01/19/2011 06:42 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:29:17AM -05
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 09:34 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 01/19/2011 09:31 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:34:09AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On 01/18/2011 05:24 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the following two patc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 09:17 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 01/19/2011 08:56 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>> another new option, this time it is pam_pwd_expiration_warning the
>> number of days a warning should be displayed before the password
>> expires.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 09:02 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:20:44PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> After asking the cache for the list of member DNs for groups
> during an initgroups request, we were passing it through the
> sanitization
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 08:57 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:19:31PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> The example sssd.conf still had entry_cache_timeout listed in the
> [nss] section, and did not have correct values for
> entry_cache_nowait
On 01/19/2011 08:00 PM, Jenny Galipeau wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> The time has finally come for SSSD to have its own IRC channel. The
>> project has grown rapidly in the last year, and we feel that it would
>> now be better to separat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 08:45 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 01/18/2011 09:40 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>> this patch makes the IPA HBAC access provider more flexible and should
>> fix trac ticket #777.
>
>
> Ack.
>
Pushed to master.
- --
Stephen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 09:31 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:34:09AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 01/18/2011 05:24 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
the following two patches add expired policies for AD and RHDS/IPA and
sh
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:34:09AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/18/2011 05:24 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the following two patches add expired policies for AD and RHDS/IPA and
> > should fix trac ticket #674 and #679, respe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 09:30 AM, Jenny Galipeau wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 01/19/2011 08:56 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>
Hi,
another new option, this time it is pam_pwd_expiration_warning the
number of days a warning should be disp
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The time has finally come for SSSD to have its own IRC channel. The
> project has grown rapidly in the last year, and we feel that it would
> now be better to separate from #freeipa (which has also grown).
>
> The proper
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/19/2011 08:56 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> another new option, this time it is pam_pwd_expiration_warning the
>> number of days a warning should be displayed before the password
>> expires.
>>
>> While w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 08:56 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> another new option, this time it is pam_pwd_expiration_warning the
> number of days a warning should be displayed before the password
> expires.
>
> While writing this patch I realized that it might
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The time has finally come for SSSD to have its own IRC channel. The
project has grown rapidly in the last year, and we feel that it would
now be better to separate from #freeipa (which has also grown).
The proper IRC venue for the discussion of SSSD-r
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:20:44PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> After asking the cache for the list of member DNs for groups
> during an initgroups request, we were passing it through the
> sanitization function. Since this had already been
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:19:31PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The example sssd.conf still had entry_cache_timeout listed in the
> [nss] section, and did not have correct values for
> entry_cache_nowait_percentage (it was listed as
> entry_
Hi,
another new option, this time it is pam_pwd_expiration_warning the
number of days a warning should be displayed before the password
expires.
While writing this patch I realized that it might not be a good idea to
set pam_verbosity to 0 (no message at all) if confdb_get_int() fails.
The second
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/18/2011 09:40 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch makes the IPA HBAC access provider more flexible and should
> fix trac ticket #777.
>
Ack.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/18/2011 05:24 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the following two patches add expired policies for AD and RHDS/IPA and
> should fix trac ticket #674 and #679, respectively.
>
Patch 0001: Ack.
Patch 0002: Nack. Could we please use "389ds" instea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 07:42 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:49:26AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 01/19/2011 06:42 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:29:17AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 01/19/2011 06:16
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:49:26AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/19/2011 06:42 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:29:17AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On 01/19/2011 06:16 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 06:42 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:29:17AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 01/19/2011 06:16 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes a typo which leads to irritation log messages.
>
>
> As a g
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:29:17AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 01/19/2011 06:16 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this patch fixes a typo which leads to irritation log messages.
>
>
> As a general rule, I prefer explicit (ret != E
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 06:16 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch fixes a typo which leads to irritation log messages.
As a general rule, I prefer explicit (ret != EOK) checks. Yes, I know
they're identical, but it reads better.
- --
Stephen Gallaghe
Hi,
this patch fixes a typo which leads to irritation log messages.
bye,
Sumit
From c530a022096338a7c7e4e09da96afa3398e599a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Bose
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:31:31 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix return value check
---
src/providers/ldap/ldap_auth.c |2 +-
1 f
27 matches
Mail list logo