[SSSD] [PATCH] Change state of hash entry if netgroup cannot be parsed

2011-03-09 Thread Sumit Bose
Hi, this patch should fix trac ticket #819. If we fail to parse the netgroup entry returned from the LDAP server the netgroup hash entry is never set to be ready and any following request will wait until the client timeout is over. While testing this I found that our current caching of

[SSSD] [PATCH] Release handle if not connected

2011-03-09 Thread Sumit Bose
Hi, this aims to be a short term fix for trac ticket #821. In general we should find out why the handle is not release when the backend goes offline. bye, Sumit From ebb4bf5612b00cef3f9e76f5568ea1d960d8b098 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sumit Bose sb...@redhat.com Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 12:52:39

[SSSD] [PATCH] Run callbacks if server IP changes

2011-03-09 Thread Jakub Hrozek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 QA found another issue with the hostname expiration. We resolved the new IP address but did not call the backend callbacks, so the Kerberos provider still tried to connect to the old server as the kdcinfo files were not refreshed with the newly

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Change state of hash entry if netgroup cannot be parsed

2011-03-09 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/09/2011 05:00 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: Hi, this patch should fix trac ticket #819. If we fail to parse the netgroup entry returned from the LDAP server the netgroup hash entry is never set to be ready and any following request will wait until

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Release handle if not connected

2011-03-09 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/09/2011 06:56 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: Hi, this aims to be a short term fix for trac ticket #821. In general we should find out why the handle is not release when the backend goes offline. Ack - -- Stephen Gallagher RHCE 804006346421761

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Run callbacks if server IP changes

2011-03-09 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/09/2011 10:14 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: QA found another issue with the hostname expiration. We resolved the new IP address but did not call the backend callbacks, so the Kerberos provider still tried to connect to the old server as the kdcinfo

Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] Update SSSD's transifex support

2011-03-09 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/08/2011 12:34 PM, Sumit Bose wrote: On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 11:28:57AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: These patches will make it easier to manage translations in the SSSD. The first patch adds the transifex_client configuration, the second

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Change state of hash entry if netgroup cannot be parsed

2011-03-09 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/09/2011 02:10 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 03/09/2011 05:00 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: Hi, this patch should fix trac ticket #819. If we fail to parse the netgroup entry returned from the LDAP server the netgroup hash entry is never set to

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Release handle if not connected

2011-03-09 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/09/2011 02:10 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 03/09/2011 06:56 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: Hi, this aims to be a short term fix for trac ticket #821. In general we should find out why the handle is not release when the backend goes offline.

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Run callbacks if server IP changes

2011-03-09 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/09/2011 02:12 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 03/09/2011 10:14 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: QA found another issue with the hostname expiration. We resolved the new IP address but did not call the backend callbacks, so the Kerberos provider still

[SSSD] [PATCH] Mention Samba libraries URLs in BUILD.txt

2011-03-09 Thread Jakub Hrozek
A developer from ArchLinux was recently confused on IRC by our suggestion to build Samba-based libraries from samba master. The libraries have their own tarballs now, so the patch explicitly mentions them - I think it still makes sense as they are not yet included in all distributions. Also