On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 09:56:18PM -0700, Ben Kevan wrote:
I'm wondering what the heck I'm doing wrong. I'm working on getting SSSD +
KRB5 working against 2008 R2 AD. It's working fine in RHEL5 w/ the standard
LDAP.conf configuration. I'm working on sssd, but am not getting a binddn
connection
Ok, this is corrected set of patches. All your comments were taken into
account. Also please note that jzeleny-015-2-minor-fixes-in-sysdb.patch which
was acked before has been updated.
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 14:24 +0200, Jan Zeleny wrote:
Here is a complete set of patches which are needed
On 04/27/2011 09:35 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Running the SSSD from the command-line with -d N would not override a
value set in the sssd.conf. This was due to a few bad architecture
decisions around how to handle the debug_level.
This patch also makes the following changes:
1) The
Function sss_krb5_unparse_name_flags and some of its supporting functions have
been added in order to ensure compilation on systems having kerberos 1.8.
Currently I don't have any machine with RHEL5, so please be sure to test the
patch on it.
Thanks
Jan
From
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 21:56 -0700, Ben Kevan wrote:
I'm wondering what the heck I'm doing wrong. I'm working on getting
SSSD + KRB5 working against 2008 R2 AD. It's working fine in RHEL5 w/
the standard LDAP.conf configuration. I'm working on sssd, but am not
getting a binddn connection to AD.
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 06:51 -0700, Ben Kevan wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 21:56 -0700, Ben Kevan wrote:
I'm wondering what the heck I'm doing wrong. I'm working on
getting
SSSD +
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.comwrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 06:51 -0700, Ben Kevan wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 21:56 -0700, Ben Kevan wrote:
I'm wondering
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 08:35 -0700, Ben Kevan wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 06:51 -0700, Ben Kevan wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 09:11 -0700, Ben Kevan wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 08:35 -0700, Ben Kevan wrote:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
We were erroneously using select() in the client code. This code can run
in arbitrary apps and using select() means we can cause memory
corruption in the calling application.
Use poll() instead.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
From 4cb12eda3231807efdc6aaa678b0734b18dc7763 Mon Sep
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 16:19 +, Simo Sorce wrote:
We were erroneously using select() in the client code. This code can run
in arbitrary apps and using select() means we can cause memory
corruption in the calling application.
Use poll() instead.
Ack and pushed to master and sssd-1-5.
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 11:35 -0700, Ben Kevan wrote:
My only issue now with the exception of the forced lowercase lookups
(SLES 11 does this by default for sAMAccount etc). Now I just need to
find out why id doesn't show that users are part of groups that are
posix compliant.
12 matches
Mail list logo
