On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 07:27:17PM -0400, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On 07/01/2011 04:44 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > And now with patches attached...
> >
> > On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 16:42 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> So many changes have been made since the original pass that I have
> >> revi
ldb_dn_new_fmt() has a bug and cannot take a NULL memory context
This hack just creates a tmp_ctx to pass to the ldb routine and then
steals it back onto the memctx before returning it.
From 5daeba168a08661aa1104b2c50f73d4c8a4a200d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephen Gallagher
Date: Fri, 8 Jul
On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 01:27 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 09:34:51AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On 06/09/2011 09:31 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > On 06/07/2011 03:11 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >> On 06/07/2011 02:46 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> the
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:34:44PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 14:59 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 07:27:17PM -0400, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > On 07/01/2011 04:44 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > And now with patches attached...
> > > >
> > > >
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 20:31 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:34:44PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 14:59 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 07:27:17PM -0400, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > > On 07/01/2011 04:44 PM, Stephen Gallagher wr
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 13:20 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 01:27 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 09:34:51AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > On 06/09/2011 09:31 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > > On 06/07/2011 03:11 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > >> On 06
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 10:39 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 16:24 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 09:53:28AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 13:41 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > > and now with patch ...
> > > >
> > > > On Thu
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 09:54 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 13:48 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this patch adds support for the NDS/eDirectory access control attributes
> > loginDisabled, loginExpirationTime and loginAllowedTimeMap. It is not
> > fully tested bec
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 12:35 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> ldb_dn_new_fmt() has a bug and cannot take a NULL memory context
>
> This hack just creates a tmp_ctx to pass to the ldb routine and then
> steals it back onto the memctx before returning it.
Ack
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc *
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 15:35 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 12:35 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > ldb_dn_new_fmt() has a bug and cannot take a NULL memory context
> >
> > This hack just creates a tmp_ctx to pass to the ldb routine and then
> > steals it back onto the memctx be
10 matches
Mail list logo