On Oct 5, 2011, at 10:39 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 13:31 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>> On 10/05/2011 12:27 PM, JR Aquino wrote:
>>> Can we not just perform a targeted search of the Originating Source's
>>> hostname to query the hostgroups that it is a memberof and if it m
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 13:31 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 10/05/2011 12:27 PM, JR Aquino wrote:
> > Can we not just perform a targeted search of the Originating Source's
> > hostname to query the hostgroups that it is a memberof and if it matches
> > any of the hostgroups listed as a srchost = pa
On 10/05/2011 12:27 PM, JR Aquino wrote:
> On Oct 5, 2011, at 4:30 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> CCing sssd-devel
>>
>> On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 22:41 +, JR Aquino wrote:
>>> So I have been looking through the results of ldbsearch and have been
>>> wondering...
>>>
>>> Why is it that I see cac
On Oct 5, 2011, at 4:30 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> CCing sssd-devel
>
> On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 22:41 +, JR Aquino wrote:
>> So I have been looking through the results of ldbsearch and have been
>> wondering...
>>
>> Why is it that I see cached entries for objects (hbac/ hosts/ etc) that
>
patch for 1.6 attached.
bug not present in 1.5.
On 10/05/2011 03:12 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 03:05:07PM +0200, Pavel Zuna wrote:
patch attached.
Pavel
Ack.
I think it would be nice to fix this in 1.5 and 1.6, too. Can you send a
rebased patch?
Pavel
pzuna_sssd_00
On Oct 5, 2011, at 4:30 AM, "Stephen Gallagher" wrote:
> CCing sssd-devel
>
> On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 22:41 +, JR Aquino wrote:
>> So I have been looking through the results of ldbsearch and have been
>> wondering...
>>
>> Why is it that I see cached entries for objects (hbac/ hosts/ etc) tha
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 14:38 +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 07:58 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 07:56 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 07:30 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > > CCing sssd-devel
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue,
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 03:05:07PM +0200, Pavel Zuna wrote:
> patch attached.
>
> Pavel
Ack.
I think it would be nice to fix this in 1.5 and 1.6, too. Can you send a
rebased patch?
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://f
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 15:05 +0200, Pavel Zuna wrote:
> patch attached.
Ack
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-d
patch attached.
Pavel
pzuna_sssd_0001_tallocctx.patch
Description: application/mbox
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 07:56:09AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 07:30 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > CCing sssd-devel
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 22:41 +, JR Aquino wrote:
> > > So I have been looking through the results of ldbsearch and have been
> > > wondering...
> On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 07:58 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 07:56 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 07:30 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > > CCing sssd-devel
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 22:41 +, JR Aquino wrote:
> > > > > So I have
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 07:58 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 07:56 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 07:30 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > CCing sssd-devel
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 22:41 +, JR Aquino wrote:
> > > > So I have been looking t
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 07:56 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 07:30 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > CCing sssd-devel
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 22:41 +, JR Aquino wrote:
> > > So I have been looking through the results of ldbsearch and have been
> > > wondering...
> > >
On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 07:30 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> CCing sssd-devel
>
> On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 22:41 +, JR Aquino wrote:
> > So I have been looking through the results of ldbsearch and have been
> > wondering...
> >
> > Why is it that I see cached entries for objects (hbac/ hosts/ e
> CCing sssd-devel
>
> On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 22:41 +, JR Aquino wrote:
> > So I have been looking through the results of ldbsearch and have been
> > wondering...
> >
> > Why is it that I see cached entries for objects (hbac/ hosts/ etc) that
> > have no correlation to the host itself?
> >
>
On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 07:30:04AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> 1) Instead of doing a full purge followed by a full write, make only
> changes. This will be a somewhat more complex logic to follow, but if
> little or nothing has changed on the server, then it will save us a LOT
> of memberOf o
CCing sssd-devel
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 22:41 +, JR Aquino wrote:
> So I have been looking through the results of ldbsearch and have been
> wondering...
>
> Why is it that I see cached entries for objects (hbac/ hosts/ etc) that
> have no correlation to the host itself?
>
> Might it be more o
18 matches
Mail list logo
