On 01/07/12 06:39, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> Do not have a code in front of me that this sounds like a bug in the
> error handling of the empty list.
> It seems that if the list is not empty the cache is reconciled by if the
> content of the netgroup is empty it chooses a different code path rather
> tha
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 01:11:57AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 02:31:51PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > It's come up more than once that SSSD needs a Frequently Asked Questions
> > page to field some of our more common questions. I'm reaching out to the
> > SSSD and F
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 16:48 +0800, Joe Jin wrote:
> On 01/07/12 06:39, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> > Do not have a code in front of me that this sounds like a bug in the
> > error handling of the empty list.
> > It seems that if the list is not empty the cache is reconciled by if the
> > content of the net
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:03:56AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 09:50 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Some older platforms (such as RHEL 5) do not support the 'realm'
> > directive in nsupdate messages. As a result, dynamic DNS update support
> > doesn't work properly
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 01:06:27PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> Dne 11.1.2012 13:47, Jan Zelený napsal(a):
> >>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1110
> >>
> >>[PATCH 1/4]
> >>I've removed FIXME and move the DEBUG message to a better place.
> >
> >I would have Acked that, but I agree with Jakub
Hi,
while working on sub-domains I started wondering why we do not keep the
sysdb handle in the sss_domain_info struct? This would make some thing
easier for sub-domains and would safe some cycles for standard domain,
because we do not need the string comparison in
sysdb_get_ctx_from_list().
I di
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 16:52 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while working on sub-domains I started wondering why we do not keep the
> sysdb handle in the sss_domain_info struct? This would make some thing
> easier for sub-domains and would safe some cycles for standard domain,
> because we do n
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 16:52 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while working on sub-domains I started wondering why we do not keep the
> sysdb handle in the sss_domain_info struct? This would make some thing
> easier for sub-domains and would safe some cycles for standard domain,
> because we do n
Fixes https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/967
Provides a workaround to two server problems:
OpenLDAP: This server will report that the paging control is available
in the RootDSE, even if it is disabled. This allows SSSD to continue to
function against such servers.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh
On Jan 16, 2012, at 1:52 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Fixes https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/967
>
> Provides a workaround to two server problems:
>
> OpenLDAP: This server will report that the paging control is available
> in the RootDSE, even if it is disabled. This allows SSSD to conti
On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 16:52 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Fixes https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/967
>
> Provides a workaround to two server problems:
>
> OpenLDAP: This server will report that the paging control is available
> in the RootDSE, even if it is disabled. This allows SSSD to c
On 01/16/12 20:40, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 16:48 +0800, Joe Jin wrote:
>> On 01/07/12 06:39, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>>> Do not have a code in front of me that this sounds like a bug in the
>>> error handling of the empty list.
>>> It seems that if the list is not empty the cache
> On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 16:52 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > Fixes https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/967
> >
> > Provides a workaround to two server problems:
> >
> > OpenLDAP: This server will report that the paging control is available
> > in the RootDSE, even if it is disabled. This al
13 matches
Mail list logo
