On 03/19/2012 07:25 PM, greg.lehm...@csiro.au wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: sssd-devel-boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org [mailto:sssd-devel-
>> boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Gallagher
>> Sent: Monday, 19 March 2012 9:57 PM
>> To: sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.o
> -Original Message-
> From: sssd-devel-boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org [mailto:sssd-devel-
> boun...@lists.fedorahosted.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Gallagher
> Sent: Monday, 19 March 2012 9:57 PM
> To: sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> Subject: Re: [SSSD] sssd.conf include feature
>
> On
On 03/19/2012 04:39 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Patch 0001: Ack
>
> Patch 0002: Ack
>
> Patch 0003: Ack
>
> Patch 0004: Ack, but it would be more efficient (maintenance-wise) to
> just memset() the struct instead of setting the individual elements to
> zero.
>
> Patch 0005: Ack
>
> Patch 0006: A
Patch 0001: Ack
Patch 0002: Ack
Patch 0003: Ack
Patch 0004: Ack, but it would be more efficient (maintenance-wise) to
just memset() the struct instead of setting the individual elements to
zero.
Patch 0005: Ack
Patch 0006: Ack
Patch 0007: Ack
Patch 0008: Ack
Patch 0009: Ack
Patch 0010: Ack
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 14:40 +0100, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 10:21 +0100, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > > > > responder/nss/nsssrv_mmap_cache.c:220
> > > > > - this condition is unnecessarry because of the condition on line 208
> > > >
> > > > Can you post the actual code snippest, if I
> On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 10:21 +0100, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > > > responder/nss/nsssrv_mmap_cache.c:220
> > > > - this condition is unnecessarry because of the condition on line 208
> > >
> > > Can you post the actual code snippest, if I understand what you mean I
> > > think I have line numbers off
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 10:21 +0100, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > > responder/nss/nsssrv_mmap_cache.c:220
> > > - this condition is unnecessarry because of the condition on line 208
> >
> > Can you post the actual code snippest, if I understand what you mean I
> > think I have line numbers off by 1 ... but
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 07:26:22AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 21:31 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:54:35PM -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> > > Should we make it a default option?
> > > It seems like in most cases it helps a lot.
>
> Not really in
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 09:16 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 06:24:53PM +1100, greg.lehm...@csiro.au wrote:
> >Wondering about whether this feature exists or is planned to exist? It is
> >for use in a shared administration environment. We have central
> >administrati
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 21:31 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 12:54:35PM -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> > Should we make it a default option?
> > It seems like in most cases it helps a lot.
Not really in "most cases". It helps a lot in Active Directory
environments because AD is pat
> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1259
Ack,
just one question: right now DEBUG won't print message that would distinguish
cased vs. non-cased name and proto (they always print lowercase), do we want
them to?
Thanks
Jan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_
> On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 14:25 +0100, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 11:49 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 14:33 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 10:15 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > > > > > Sure, we can talk about it. I'm looking at it f
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 06:24:53PM +1100, greg.lehm...@csiro.au wrote:
>Wondering about whether this feature exists or is planned to exist? It is
>for use in a shared administration environment. We have central
>administration and local administrators. It would allow a central
>conf
After the recent changes to sysdb_attrs_get_aliases() we stopped saving
the lowercased alias of the primary name.
Services are a different beast than the rest of the entries, because
with everything else the nss responder only uses the alias to match the
entry. With services, we also need to print
Wondering about whether this feature exists or is planned to exist? It is for
use in a shared administration environment. We have central administration and
local administrators. It would allow a central configuration for sssd with
local changes. Puppet could manage the central main file and inc
15 matches
Mail list logo
