Sorry, I didn't notice during the review, only when I was triaging Rob's
#1363.
From 926f065eb2f4724bec14a7e13c9bd5a4d4574547 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 15:12:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix the default sssd.conf path
---
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 15:14 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Sorry, I didn't notice during the review, only when I was triaging Rob's
#1363.
Obvious ack and pushed to master.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
The block that upgraded the version was at a wrong indentation level, so
it never ran if there were no fake users to convert.
From da8c1b67bb8f881ad463184aa389bb2690c6cadd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 15:36:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix the
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 15:46 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
The block that upgraded the version was at a wrong indentation level, so
it never ran if there were no fake users to convert.
Ah, good catch. I only tested upgrades with valid data in the cache when
I reviewed the original patch.
Ack.
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 02:49:48PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 02:15:37PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 01:06:11PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 09:09:53AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 03:04:36PM +0200,
