On 09/07/12 15:21, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
The name context was not being initialized for local provider
domains because it was handled after skipping over the back-end
initialization routine. This patch moves the name context init
routine to occur earlier.
Fixes https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/t
The name context was not being initialized for local provider
domains because it was handled after skipping over the back-end
initialization routine. This patch moves the name context init
routine to occur earlier.
Fixes https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1412
From a3dd29658cd8fbe9b11d3c3721e5ec
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 19:00 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 12:17:29PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > All of these patches are fairly trivial one- or two-liners.
> >
> > They were detected by Coverity scan.
>
> Ack to all.
Pushed to master.
signature.asc
Description:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 12:17:29PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> All of these patches are fairly trivial one- or two-liners.
>
> They were detected by Coverity scan.
Ack to all.
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://f
All of these patches are fairly trivial one- or two-liners.
They were detected by Coverity scan.
From 2cd1d3393b9cb9b4a7720e445240b06d71e0cd5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephen Gallagher
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 11:35:26 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] Fix use-after-free
Coverity #12803
---
src/
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:05:37PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 21:01 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 01:30:02PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 18:51 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 09:12:16AM -0400, Simo Sorce
On Sat, 2012-07-07 at 14:09 +0200, lists wrote:
> Hi SSSD developers,
>
> I like to submit two patches that both fix compilation issues when using
> Heimdal as kerberos provider.
>
> I know the official position regarding Heimdal support. So when the
> issues are small, like these two patches, I
On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 22:02 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> I was not able to log in today, I was getting krb5_child segfaults. The
> attached patch fixed that.
Nack.
I fail to see how this could possibly have caused a segfault. The
previous version would have been printing either "true" or "false"