new patch.
thanks again.
> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 19:21:17 +0200
> From: mzi...@redhat.com
> To: sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> Subject: Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] 1371-Missing resolv.conf should be non-fatal
>
> On 09/13/2012 05:18 AM, Ariel Barria wrote:
> >
> > hi, new patch :).
> >
> > Apparent
> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 19:21:17 +0200
> From: mzi...@redhat.com
> To: sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> Subject: Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] 1371-Missing resolv.conf should be non-fatal
>
> On 09/13/2012 05:18 AM, Ariel Barria wrote:
> >
> > hi, new patch :).
> >
> > Apparently was required also mon
== Highlights ==
The SSSD team is proud to announce a Release Candidate of version 1.9 of
the System Security Services Daemon.
This is a bugfix release only, no new features were added in this version.
We will be focusing on more stabilizing after that point until the final
1.9.0 release which is
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 15:12 +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
> On 09/12/2012 02:39 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
> > Patch 1 - tools_util.h now provides signal_sssd function. It
> > replaces send_sighup function from sss_debuglevel.c. It can
> > be used to send any signal to monitor (used in patch 2).
> >
> >
On 09/13/2012 07:26 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed 12 Sep 2012 09:12:08 AM EDT, Michal Židek wrote:
On 09/12/2012 02:39 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
Patch 1 - tools_util.h now provides signal_sssd function. It
replaces send_sighup function from sss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed 12 Sep 2012 09:12:08 AM EDT, Michal Židek wrote:
> On 09/12/2012 02:39 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
>> Patch 1 - tools_util.h now provides signal_sssd function. It
>> replaces send_sighup function from sss_debuglevel.c. It can
>> be used to send any
On 09/13/2012 05:18 AM, Ariel Barria wrote:
hi, new patch :).
Apparently was required also monitor_config_file_fallback().
> Hi Ariel,
>
> actually I reread the patch and I think there is a simpler way to fix
> the ticket..directly in the monitor_config_file() function, there is
> already
On 09/13/2012 04:48 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 03:24:05PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 09/13/2012 12:24 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
In order to test these patches properly, you need to be running the
latest patches that are currently on review on freeipa-devel. Ping me
off-li
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 01:20:58PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 09/12/2012 07:50 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Please see the attached patch. This is more of a band-aid, but the
> >correct solution would be much more involved and is being tracked by
> >#1522.
>
> Ack. Great job catching this!
Pu
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 03:24:05PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 09/13/2012 12:24 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >In order to test these patches properly, you need to be running the
> >latest patches that are currently on review on freeipa-devel. Ping me
> >off-line for access to such IPA client.
> >
On 09/13/2012 12:24 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
In order to test these patches properly, you need to be running the
latest patches that are currently on review on freeipa-devel. Ping me
off-line for access to such IPA client.
[PATCH 1/2] DB: Always write the SELinux object to sysdb
This is a fallout
On 09/12/2012 07:50 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Please see the attached patch. This is more of a band-aid, but the
correct solution would be much more involved and is being tracked by
#1522.
Ack. Great job catching this!
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-
In order to test these patches properly, you need to be running the
latest patches that are currently on review on freeipa-devel. Ping me
off-line for access to such IPA client.
[PATCH 1/2] DB: Always write the SELinux object to sysdb
This is a fallout of the transaction processing refactoring.
T
On 09/12/2012 07:50 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Please see the attached patch. This is more of a band-aid, but the
correct solution would be much more involved and is being tracked by
#1522.
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
h
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 03:51:22PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 09/11/2012 05:48 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1438
> >
> >This off-by-one bug would hit us especially when using the negative
> >cache, I guess it was because we would strdup and later retrieve
>
15 matches
Mail list logo