it's true, simplifies quite a bit. thanks :)> Hi,
> please consider squashing in the attached patch. I think it simplifies
> the logic some more and just aborts the rest of the file watching
> functions in case the config file is not there (which seems like a
> logical behaviour)
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 05:34:17PM +0200, Joschi Brauchle wrote:
> Hallo Jakub,
>
> I have tested the latest patch successfully.
>
> Please note that in the 2nd hunk,
> 1) the line with "KRB5_DEBUG(1, kerr);" should also be removed to
> avoid duplicate debug messages and
> 2) you could directly c
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:26:15AM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
> On 09/14/2012 05:40 AM, Ariel Barria wrote:
> >new patch.
> >thanks again.
> >
> > > Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 19:21:17 +0200
> > > From: mzi...@redhat.com
> > > To: sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> > > Subject: Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] 1371
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 02:53:30PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:14:12AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1521
> >
>
> Ack
>
> > The problem was in all providers, not just LDAP.
>
> Sure, it's just that the QE only tested the LDAP pr
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 08:43:53AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon 17 Sep 2012 08:21:01 AM EDT, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1394
> >
>
> Ack
Pushed to master.
__
- Original Message -
> Ok. I changed it all a bit. The mechanism is now as follows:
> 1. sss_cache creates a file, that serves as flag with the meaning
> "It was me, who sended SIGHUP".
> 2. monitor receives sighup and checks if the flag (file) exist
> - exists: signal (dbus signal) n
On 09/17/2012 03:11 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
On 09/14/2012 07:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 17:16 +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
On 09/13/2012 07:59 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Main questions:
the invalidation functions seem to be called unconditionally, what
prevent cache invalidation d
On 09/14/2012 07:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 17:16 +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
On 09/13/2012 07:59 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Main questions:
the invalidation functions seem to be called unconditionally, what
prevent cache invalidation durint a normal log rotation ?
Shouldn't cache
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:14:12AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1521
>
Ack
> The problem was in all providers, not just LDAP.
Sure, it's just that the QE only tested the LDAP provider so far so they
filed it against the LDAP provider..
_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon 17 Sep 2012 08:21:01 AM EDT, Pavel Březina wrote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1394
>
Ack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlBXG
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1394
From 4388a7173632297733da409590cd9b240a88f3d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Pavel=20B=C5=99ezina?=
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:33:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] rpm: put localized sssd_krb5_locator_plugin manpages into
client
Localized sssd_krb5_loc
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1521
The problem was in all providers, not just LDAP.
From 5a7beea2078d6d2a7bd26f5972a07737097cbc8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Pavel=20B=C5=99ezina?=
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:11:28 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Failover: use _srv_ when no primary serv
12 matches
Mail list logo