On 11/06/2012 02:09 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 14:00 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On Tue 06 Nov 2012 01:54:46 PM EST, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>>> On 11/06/2012 01:45 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
• If all lists are empty, access is granted
• If
Hi,
> +
> +errno_t sss_br_lock_file(int fd, size_t start, size_t len,
> + int retries, useconds_t wait)
> +{
> +int ret;
> +struct flock lock;
> +int retries_left;
> +
> +lock.l_type = F_WRLCK;
> +lock.l_whence = SEEK_SET;
> +lock.l_start = start;
>
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 14:00 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue 06 Nov 2012 01:54:46 PM EST, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> > On 11/06/2012 01:45 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >> • If all lists are empty, access is granted
> >> • If any list is provided, the order of evaluatio
On Tue 06 Nov 2012 01:54:46 PM EST, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 11/06/2012 01:45 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
• If all lists are empty, access is granted
• If any list is provided, the order of evaluation is
allow,deny. This means that any matching deny rule
On 11/06/2012 01:45 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 13:12 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>> On 11/06/2012 10:50 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> Just to be clear this is how I see it:
>>>
>>> config file | confdb | result
>>> --
>>>
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 13:12 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 11/06/2012 10:50 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > Just to be clear this is how I see it:
> >
> > config file | confdb | result
> > --
> > no attr | 'ALL' | all user can
On 11/06/2012 10:50 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 10:26 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>> On 11/06/2012 09:24 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 15:10 +0100, Ondrej Kos wrote:
On 11/06/2012 02:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 14:46 +0100, Ondrej Kos w
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 10:26 -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 11/06/2012 09:24 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 15:10 +0100, Ondrej Kos wrote:
> >> On 11/06/2012 02:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 14:46 +0100, Ondrej Kos wrote:
> On 11/02/2012 05:32 PM, Simo Sor
On 11/06/2012 09:24 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 15:10 +0100, Ondrej Kos wrote:
>> On 11/06/2012 02:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 14:46 +0100, Ondrej Kos wrote:
On 11/02/2012 05:32 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 10:10 -0400, Dmitri Pal w
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 03:36:37PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 11/05/2012 06:16 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 05:54:10PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>I found this bug when setting my own trust environment.
> >>
> >>I was unable to match username@subdomain to subdomain. Th
On 11/05/2012 06:16 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 05:54:10PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
I found this bug when setting my own trust environment.
I was unable to match username@subdomain to subdomain. This patch
puts me a step forward. I can match the subdomain now, but I can't
g
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 15:10 +0100, Ondrej Kos wrote:
> On 11/06/2012 02:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 14:46 +0100, Ondrej Kos wrote:
> >> On 11/02/2012 05:32 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 10:10 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 11/02/2012 09:50 AM, Stef Wal
On 11/06/2012 02:52 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 14:46 +0100, Ondrej Kos wrote:
On 11/02/2012 05:32 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 10:10 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 11/02/2012 09:50 AM, Stef Walter wrote:
On 11/02/2012 01:57 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
First let us defi
A manpage translation was accepted that violated the DTD. As a result,
the Catalan translation for sssd-simple(5) was failing. This patch
should fix it.
>From 4e2b8e8792bebd0250c9f6057dcba6ef190ca714 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephen Gallagher
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 08:51:35 -0500
Subject: [
On Tue 06 Nov 2012 02:44:09 AM EST, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Patch 0003: Fix the SSSDConfig API so that the 'force_timeout'
option is accepted for services and domains (or else consumers of
the API like ipa-client or authconfig might throw 'unknown option'
errors).
=
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 14:46 +0100, Ondrej Kos wrote:
> On 11/02/2012 05:32 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 10:10 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> >> On 11/02/2012 09:50 AM, Stef Walter wrote:
> >>> On 11/02/2012 01:57 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> First let us define a general rule about h
On 11/02/2012 05:32 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 10:10 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 11/02/2012 09:50 AM, Stef Walter wrote:
On 11/02/2012 01:57 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
First let us define a general rule about how we treat the cases:
X =
Is it treated as X being undefined or X havin
On 11/02/2012 11:50 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 03:04:11PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
It's because the DB cannot hold an empty value.
With the current interface empty value = No value.
You can easily check for an option being present with
confdb_get_param(). Then look at its
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 01:26:04PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
> On 11/01/2012 02:45 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 09:14 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >>On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 11:19 +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
> >>>On 11/01/2012 06:54 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 12:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:51:57PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
> On 11/01/2012 12:09 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 06:53:47PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
> >>I found this bug while working on:
> >>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1584
> >>
> >>If no objects for deletion were
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 08:03:19PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 07:48:38PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 04:28:52PM +0200, Ondrej Kos wrote:
> > > On 10/17/2012 03:52 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > >Fixes https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1481
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 08:48:19AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 12:37 +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > Hi,
> > there were some more coding style issues (mostly missing space after
> > comma). When I was in it I changed all debug levels there to macros.
> > There was actually a
On 11/05/2012 09:18 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 18:16 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 05:54:10PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
I found this bug when setting my own trust environment.
I was unable to match username@subdomain to subdomain. This patch
puts me a step
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 06:37:34PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> ---
> src/providers/ipa/ipa_id.c | 128
>
> 1 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/providers/ipa/ipa_id.c b/src/providers/ipa/ipa_id.c
> index
> ab0d89240
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 06:37:35PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Avoids hardcodinf magic numbers everywhere and selfdocuments why a
> mask is being applied.
> ---
> src/providers/data_provider.h |1 +
> src/providers/ipa/ipa_id.c|2 +-
> src/providers/ipa/ipa_subdomains_id
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 06:37:32PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> ---
> src/providers/ipa/ipa_id.c|5 +-
> src/providers/ipa/ipa_id.h| 10 ++--
> src/providers/ipa/ipa_subdomains_id.c | 73
> +
> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 52 del
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 06:37:33PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Also do not intermix two tevent_req sequences
> ---
> src/providers/ipa/ipa_id.c | 151
> +---
> 1 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
>
The code seems fine to me but can you just
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 06:37:31PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> No functionality changes,
> just make the code respect the tevent_req style and naming conventions
> and enhance readability by adding some helper functions.
> ---
> src/providers/krb5/krb5_access.c |6 +-
> src/providers/krb5/k
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 06:37:30PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> While I was working on an unrelated patchset I couldn't help fixing some
> of the code to properly use tevent_req style and naming conventions.
>
I think the krb5_auth code is so old that it predates the tevent_req
style. Up until now
29 matches
Mail list logo
