On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 14:28 +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> [PATCH 4/6]
> solves 2
>
Sorry, but I fail to understand why the sudo client needs to know about
sssd domains at all.
I am guilty of not having followed the original sudo patches submission
process, but without knowing if there is a valid r
The original sysdb code had a strong assumption that only users from one
domain are saved in the databse, with the subdomain feature, we have
changed reality, but have not adjusted all the code arund the sysdb calls
to not rely on the original assumption.
One of the side effects of this incongrune
This patch changes the way subdomain users are stored in the database.
The reason for changing the way we do it is that the sysdb code, before the
subdomain patches were added assumed a single domain per cache file. This
assumption beled in many other interfaces including the way users are read an
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 12:09 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
>
> New series attached.
>
ack and pushed to master and 1-9
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 15:10 +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
> On 11/08/2012 08:16 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > While looking at the mc code I came up with this patch that makes the
> > code a little bit cleaner.
> ACK.
Thanks, pushed to master only.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
_