On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:50:17PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Patch 0059: Stop creating fake sysdb contexts
Ack from my point of view, but Sumit is a better authority on
subdomains. But ID operations in a trusted domain still worked.
Sumit did test the patchset in a trusted environment (thank
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:58:45AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:50:17PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Patch 0059: Stop creating fake sysdb contexts
Ack from my point of view, but Sumit is a better authority on
subdomains. But ID operations in a trusted domain still
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:14:38AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:58:45AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:50:17PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Patch 0059: Stop creating fake sysdb contexts
Ack from my point of view, but Sumit is a better
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 11:17 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:14:38AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:58:45AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:50:17PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Patch 0059: Stop creating fake sysdb contexts
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 09:02 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1757
When the user entry was missing completely after initgroups, we would
never invalidate the user entry from cache. This led to dangling cache
entried in memory cache if the user was removed from
Patch only for master.
I'm sorry, I missed this codepath when testing the recent changes.
From ac3aed75dbfcfdd4af605ca5bea0ac4baf7c2517 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 14:32:31 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] TOOLS: set domain in check_group_names
---
The attached patches fix https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1764. We
were only invalidating memcache when removing users or groups, but we
should invalidate it on any changes including changes to group
memberships etc.
From 3f010184531e7ab2974fca86cc43edc6a2c8c0ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 08:20:28AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 11:17 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:14:38AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:58:45AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:50:17PM +0100, Jakub
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 08:27:32AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 09:02 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1757
When the user entry was missing completely after initgroups, we would
never invalidate the user entry from cache. This led to
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 02:38:59PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Patch only for master.
I'm sorry, I missed this codepath when testing the recent changes.
ACK
bye,
Sumit
From ac3aed75dbfcfdd4af605ca5bea0ac4baf7c2517 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com
Date: Tue,
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 02:41:33PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
The attached patches fix https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1764. We
were only invalidating memcache when removing users or groups, but we
should invalidate it on any changes including changes to group
memberships etc.
Patches
The function tried to be smart and realloc only when needed, but that
only lead to hard-to find bugs where the logic would not allocate the
proper space. Remove the reallocation and prefer readability over speed
in this case.
In particular, if one iteration hit the if (num_added == 0) add=NULL
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 04:01:17PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 02:41:33PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
The attached patches fix https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1764. We
were only invalidating memcache when removing users or groups, but we
should invalidate it on any
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:38 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
The function tried to be smart and realloc only when needed, but that
only lead to hard-to find bugs where the logic would not allocate the
proper space. Remove the reallocation and prefer readability over
speed
in this case.
In
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 03:58:09PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 02:38:59PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Patch only for master.
I'm sorry, I missed this codepath when testing the recent changes.
ACK
bye,
Sumit
Pushed to master.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 02:12:48PM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:38 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
The function tried to be smart and realloc only when needed, but that
only lead to hard-to find bugs where the logic would not allocate the
proper space. Remove the
16 matches
Mail list logo