- Original Message -
> From: "Pavel Březina"
> To: sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 11:43:26 AM
> Subject: [SSSD] [PATCH] refactor nested group processing
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1784
I should have probably add that this is the final
On 02/01/2013 11:56 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
No functional change, it's just bad manners to have a code structured
like:
if (ret != EOK) {
/* Do stuff */
} else {
/* Do different stuff */
}
The else was moved to the topmost block.
Ack.
Michal
__
On Friday 2013-02-22 17:31, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> I have here a LDAP user entry which has this attribute
>>
>> loginAllowedTimeMap::
>> AP///38AAP///38AAP///38AAP///38AAP///38A
>>
>> In the function sysdb_attrs_add_string(), called from
>> sdap_attrs_add_ldap_attr(),
On 02/14/2013 08:24 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
A simple one-liner. According to git grep, no other example in the man
pages suggests enumerate=true.
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1737
I haven't find any other places in documentation that would suggest
enumerate = true.
Ack.
Michal
_
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:32:50PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1755
I agree, I can't think of a reason why we should be failing to store a
group completely when we can't find one of its members for one reason or
another.
I haven't really done much testing bu
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 01:20:47PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> I have here a LDAP user entry which has this attribute
>
> loginAllowedTimeMap::
>AP///38AAP///38AAP///38AAP///38AAP///38A
>
> In the function sysdb_attrs_add_string(), called from
> sdap_attrs_add_lda
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 04:41:15PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 04:32:44PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 02:57:08PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > > On 02/22/2013 09:33 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > >On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Jakub Hroze
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 03:17:36PM +0100, Ondrej Kos wrote:
> On 02/14/2013 08:21 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >The attached patch fixes https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1808. When
> >the domain pam expiration is not set at all, default to -1 so that the
> >Kerberos provider can pick its default o
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 04:32:44PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 02:57:08PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > On 02/22/2013 09:33 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > >On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >>On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 05:16:07PM +0100, Sumit Bose wr
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 02:57:08PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 02/22/2013 09:33 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 05:16:07PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >>>After a discussion with Simo I updated the page again.
> >
On Thursday 2013-02-21 13:20, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>The problem exists since at least sssd-1.8.5 [openSUSE 12.2]. The patch
>is against HEAD and applies there likewise.
Just for the record, the problem does not exist in sssd-1.5.11 (the
version we shipped in openSUSE 12.1). AFAICS, sssd-1.5.11
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There is a large amount of duplicated code being linked into multiple
SSSD binaries. Instead of statically linking this code throughout the
SSSD, we should instead create private shared libraries for them and
drop this code on the system only once.
T
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1755
From bac604c707903ba9dc9346d45bc43a26859e582b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Pavel=20B=C5=99ezina?=
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:27:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] sdap_fill_memberships: continue if a member is not foud in
sysdb
https://fedorahosted.or
On 02/22/2013 09:33 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 05:16:07PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
After a discussion with Simo I updated the page again.
bye,
Sumit
Hi,
I think this plugin architecture matches what we discuss
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 05:16:07PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > After a discussion with Simo I updated the page again.
> >
> > bye,
> > Sumit
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> I think this plugin architecture matches what we discussed over the
> pho
15 matches
Mail list logo