On (04/04/13 14:23), Ariel Barria wrote:
>Patch for Add libcmocka in the list the dependency to remove warning in the
>building sssd.
>
diff --git a/BUILD.txt b/BUILD.txt
index
263129215d6af43869a9d97bbd291436b2cc914d..c5f0cd8dd605d0f5ecef368bd07eefb14831
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 09:12:07AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (04/04/13 14:23), Ariel Barria wrote:
> >Patch for Add libcmocka in the list the dependency to remove warning in the
> >building sssd.
> >
> diff --git a/BUILD.txt b/BUILD.txt
> index
> 2
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 01:26:12PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>We can also use it to initialize sdap_id_ctx instead of calling
> >>sssm_ipa_id_init from other places.
>
> Given it more thoughts I don't think we should go this way. I like the
> sssm_ipa_init() concept though and we should proba
Another Coverity bug..
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1864
>From 5ba13376f1fd79927cd1ac5a5ef6f0bf99802a48 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 20:36:43 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Check for the correct variables
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1864
---
src/pro
On 04/05/2013 12:07 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
Another Coverity bug..
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1864
Obvious ack.
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 12:24:05PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> Commit should say it all.
> We do not have any security issue (that I know off) with the current
> code, but I want to tighten up the privileges more given we do not need
> the additional capabilities in the krb5_child anyway.
>
> Simo.
On (04/04/13 12:24), Simo Sorce wrote:
>Commit should say it all.
>We do not have any security issue (that I know off) with the current
>code, but I want to tighten up the privileges more given we do not need
>the additional capabilities in the krb5_child anyway.
>
>Simo.
>
>--
>Simo Sorce * Red H
On 04/04/2013 11:43 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 01:11:23PM -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 04/04/2013 06:25 AM, Ondrej Kos wrote:
On 04/03/2013 10:39 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 04/03/2013 07:36 AM, Ondrej Kos wrote:
Hi,
Issue found by coverity, the code itself was inaccessibile
On (02/04/13 17:44), Ondrej Kos wrote:
>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1855
>
>I couldn't let it this way when I saw the code :)
>Patch is attached
>
>Ondra
>--
>Ondrej Kos
>Associate Software Engineer
>Identity Management
>Red Hat Czech
>
>phone: +420-532-294-558
>cell: +420-736-417-909
>e
On 04/05/2013 01:52 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (02/04/13 17:44), Ondrej Kos wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1855
I couldn't let it this way when I saw the code :)
Patch is attached
Ondra
--
Ondrej Kos
Associate Software Engineer
Identity Management
Red Hat Czech
phone: +420-532
On (05/04/13 14:02), Ondrej Kos wrote:
>On 04/05/2013 01:52 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>On (02/04/13 17:44), Ondrej Kos wrote:
>>>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1855
>>>
>>>I couldn't let it this way when I saw the code :)
>>>Patch is attached
>>>
>>>Ondra
>>>--
>>>Ondrej Kos
>>>Associate So
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/05/2013 05:16 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 09:12:07AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (04/04/13 14:23), Ariel Barria wrote:
>>> Patch for Add libcmocka in the list the dependency to remove
>>> warning in the building sss
On 04/05/2013 02:10 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (05/04/13 14:02), Ondrej Kos wrote:
On 04/05/2013 01:52 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (02/04/13 17:44), Ondrej Kos wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1855
I couldn't let it this way when I saw the code :)
Patch is attached
Ondra
--
O
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 12:26 +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (04/04/13 12:24), Simo Sorce wrote:
> >Commit should say it all.
> >We do not have any security issue (that I know off) with the current
> >code, but I want to tighten up the privileges more given we do not need
> >the additional capabi
On (05/04/13 08:47), Simo Sorce wrote:
>On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 12:26 +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (04/04/13 12:24), Simo Sorce wrote:
>> >Commit should say it all.
>> >We do not have any security issue (that I know off) with the current
>> >code, but I want to tighten up the privileges more g
Hi Jakub,
I have made necessary changes, please review it.
thanks,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:44:47AM +0530, Abhishek Singh wrote:
> > Hi Jakub,
> >
> > I have done requested changes and have attached the patch with this mail.
> > Kindly r
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 08:13:53AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/05/2013 05:16 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 09:12:07AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (04/04/13 14:23), Ariel Barria wrote:
> >>> Patch for Ad
On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 15:02 +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (05/04/13 08:47), Simo Sorce wrote:
> >On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 12:26 +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (04/04/13 12:24), Simo Sorce wrote:
> >> >Commit should say it all.
> >> >We do not have any security issue (that I know off) with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/05/2013 09:10 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 08:13:53AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 04/05/2013 05:16 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 09:12:07AM
On (05/04/13 09:27), Simo Sorce wrote:
>On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 15:02 +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (05/04/13 08:47), Simo Sorce wrote:
>> >On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 12:26 +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >> On (04/04/13 12:24), Simo Sorce wrote:
>> >> >Commit should say it all.
>> >> >We do not ha
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1869
Currently the private data passed to the PAM request is a structure
allocated on the client context. But in the odd case where the back end
would be stopped or stuck until the idle timeout hits, the DP callback.
This patch introduces a new structure alloc
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 04:19:11PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (05/04/13 09:27), Simo Sorce wrote:
> >On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 15:02 +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (05/04/13 08:47), Simo Sorce wrote:
> >> >On Fri, 2013-04-05 at 12:26 +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> >> On (04/04/13 12:
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:11:12PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 04/05/2013 12:07 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Another Coverity bug..
> >
> >https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1864
>
> Obvious ack.
Pushed to master.
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-d
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 06:12:13PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
> On 04/03/2013 05:58 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
> >The first patch fixes coverity bugs mentioned in ticked
> >https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1865
> >
> >The second fixes wrong condition after waitpid.
> >
> >Michal
> >
>
> I forgot
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 05:22:13PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 06:12:13PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
> > On 04/03/2013 05:58 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
> > >The first patch fixes coverity bugs mentioned in ticked
> > >https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1865
> > >
> > >The se
Hopefully this is the last real issue that Coverity discovered.
>From 4ec51e8f8ccfee414a8ce01a093ca929c0835ea2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 15:14:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] LDAP: Always fail if a map can't be found
---
src/providers/ldap/sdap.c | 5 +
1 fi
See attached patch. It was possible to install libiniconfig_devel and
not have all the proper headers in place.
>From 30d760b2888e3d2a55390b1691bbab4ff2d39cf0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 17:50:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] libiniconfig_devel must require libref_ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri 05 Apr 2013 11:52:50 AM EDT, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> See attached patch. It was possible to install libiniconfig_devel
> and not have all the proper headers in place.
>
Ack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:03:47PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri 05 Apr 2013 11:52:50 AM EDT, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > See attached patch. It was possible to install libiniconfig_devel
> > and not have all the proper headers in place.
>
On (05/04/13 17:39), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>Hopefully this is the last real issue that Coverity discovered.
>From 4ec51e8f8ccfee414a8ce01a093ca929c0835ea2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Jakub Hrozek
>Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 15:14:34 +0200
>Subject: [PATCH] LDAP: Always fail if a map can't be found
>
30 matches
Mail list logo