On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 19:45 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 05:30:09PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > one of the issues reported in
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975001 is a core dump in the
> > PAC responder. I thought that I can find missing resul
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 05:30:09PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one of the issues reported in
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975001 is a core dump in the
> PAC responder. I thought that I can find missing results by checking for
> ENOENT which is wrong in this case. This patch
Hi,
one of the issues reported in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=975001 is a core dump in the
PAC responder. I thought that I can find missing results by checking for
ENOENT which is wrong in this case. This patch properly checks the
number of results.
bye,
Sumit
From c6943b2331a3d2a
On (18/06/13 11:15), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:29:36AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (17/06/13 19:47), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 05:28:17PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >> On (03/06/13 22:41), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >> >On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 1
On 12.6.2013 11:46, Pavel Březina wrote:
+if (state->count != 1) {
+ret = sysdb_delete_ssh_host(state->domain->sysdb, state->domain,
+state->name);
+if (ret != EOK && ret != ENOENT) {
+goto done;
+}
+
+if (state->
On 06/10/2013 02:22 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (10/06/13 10:54), Pavel Březina wrote:
On 06/10/2013 10:32 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 06/03/2013 10:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:54:34PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (03/06/13 12:50), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1947
A fast explanation how _srv_ expansion works. _srv_ is inserted into
server list as so called meta server. Let us consider following
configuration:
*Setup*
ipa_server = _srv_, ipa.pb
server list will contain: meta -> ipa.pb
*Expansion*
meta -> ipa.pb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/18/2013 06:12 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:05:44PM +0200, steve wrote:
>> You should not run autoreconf on the tarball. If you do, it will
>> not build.
>
> That was a bug that should be fixed now. As a matter of fact, we
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 12:05:44PM +0200, steve wrote:
> On 18/06/13 11:54, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 09:43:04AM +0200, steve wrote:
> >>On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 09:02 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:58:54AM -0500, Ariel Barria wrote:
> done.
> T
On 18/06/13 11:54, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 09:43:04AM +0200, steve wrote:
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 09:02 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:58:54AM -0500, Ariel Barria wrote:
done.
Thank you for comments.
I must admit I forgot about this patch (it wasn't e
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 02:06:03PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:42:44PM +0200, Ondrej Kos wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > While working on one issue, I created clean minimal fedora virtual machine
> > and while installing dependencies for building SSSD (from BUILD.txt), I
> > not
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 09:43:04AM +0200, steve wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 09:02 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:58:54AM -0500, Ariel Barria wrote:
> > > done.
> > > Thank you for comments.
> >
> > I must admit I forgot about this patch (it wasn't even found by
> > Co
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 03:25:40PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/17/2013 03:21 PM, Pavel Brezina wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> From: "Stephen Gallagher" To: "Development
> >> of the System Security Services Dae
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:29:36AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (17/06/13 19:47), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 05:28:17PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (03/06/13 22:41), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> >On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 12:30:47AM -0700, C. S. wrote:
> >> >> Hi Jakub
On (17/06/13 19:47), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 05:28:17PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (03/06/13 22:41), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 12:30:47AM -0700, C. S. wrote:
>> >> Hi Jakub,
>> >>
>> >> Enclosed is the squashed patch.
>> >>
>> >> No worries, re-
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 09:39:20AM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 06/18/2013 09:02 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:58:54AM -0500, Ariel Barria wrote:
> >>done.
> >>Thank you for comments.
> >
> >I must admit I forgot about this patch (it wasn't even found by
> >Coverity), I'
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 09:02 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:58:54AM -0500, Ariel Barria wrote:
> > done.
> > Thank you for comments.
>
> I must admit I forgot about this patch (it wasn't even found by
> Coverity), I'm sorry.
>
> Attached is a version with slightly reworded
On 06/18/2013 09:02 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:58:54AM -0500, Ariel Barria wrote:
done.
Thank you for comments.
I must admit I forgot about this patch (it wasn't even found by
Coverity), I'm sorry.
Why would it be found by Coverity?
Attached is a version with sligh
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:58:54AM -0500, Ariel Barria wrote:
> done.
> Thank you for comments.
I must admit I forgot about this patch (it wasn't even found by
Coverity), I'm sorry.
Attached is a version with slightly reworded BUILD.txt contents. The
attribution still belongs to Ariel, of course.
19 matches
Mail list logo