On (10/03/14 14:31), Dmitri Pal wrote:
>On 03/10/2014 02:30 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>On (08/03/14 02:00), Dmitri Pal wrote:
>>>On 03/08/2014 01:40 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 03/07/2014 12:00 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 05:49:44PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>On Fr
On 03/10/2014 02:30 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (08/03/14 02:00), Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 03/08/2014 01:40 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 03/07/2014 12:00 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 05:49:44PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 10:19:11AM -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 03:02:30PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 12:48:31PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > On 03/07/2014 12:00 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 11:08:17AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > >>On 02/25/2014 10:11 AM, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > >
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 05:22:27PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 07:43:24AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (26/02/14 14:12), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:33:10AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > >> On 02/24/2014 05:39 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >>
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 07:43:24AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (26/02/14 14:12), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:33:10AM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >> On 02/24/2014 05:39 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> >Hi,
> >> >
> >> >The attached two patches are related to:
> >> >https:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 10:59:13PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 09:13:55PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the current AD provider code expects a connection to the Global Catalog
> > to resolve cross-domain group memberships correctly. The patch enables
> > this fo
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:25:56AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 01:04:38PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 12:23:18PM -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > > Before this patch, a different set of options was used when calling
> > > krb5_get_init_creds_pas
On (10/03/14 16:12), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:42:09PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (10/03/14 12:32), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 07:37:00AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >> On (18/11/13 10:59), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >> >On (18/11/13 10:41), L
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:42:09PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (10/03/14 12:32), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 07:37:00AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (18/11/13 10:59), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> >On (18/11/13 10:41), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> >>ehlo,
> >> >>
> >
On (10/03/14 12:31), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 07:30:40AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> Patch is attached.
>
>It is not :-)
I would bet I attached patch.
LS
>From 8e188e8bc7be01d0c62791e7e05070084b8cdf51 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Slebodnik
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2014
On (10/03/14 12:32), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 07:37:00AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (18/11/13 10:59), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >On (18/11/13 10:41), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >>ehlo,
>> >>
>> >>Static library libsss_test_common calls tevent functions directly (in
>> >
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 07:37:00AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (18/11/13 10:59), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >On (18/11/13 10:41), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>ehlo,
> >>
> >>Static library libsss_test_common calls tevent functions directly (in module
> >>common_tev.c), but it was not linked with
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 07:30:40AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> Patch is attached.
It is not :-)
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 01:04:38PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 12:23:18PM -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> > Before this patch, a different set of options was used when calling
> > krb5_get_init_creds_password() for the changepw principal. Because
> > this set of options
ehlo,
We had in source code following pattern #elif HAVE_
It worked because undefined identifier(in some cases) was evaluated to 0.
But we do not care about value of HAVE_SOMETHING. We just need to know
whether identifier was defined.
There is not equivalent to #ifdef (short for of #if definded)
15 matches
Mail list logo