- Original Message -
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:50:18PM -0400, Yassir Elley wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:29:37PM -0400, Yassir Elley wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:3
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:50:18PM -0400, Yassir Elley wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:29:37PM -0400, Yassir Elley wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:30:15PM -0400, Yassir Elley wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
>
On 05/23/2014 09:13 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 07:09:23PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 05/23/2014 07:06 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:00:49PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 05/22/2014 11:17 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:07:51AM +0200,
- Original Message -
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:29:37PM -0400, Yassir Elley wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:30:15PM -0400, Yassir Elley wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > The attached patch adds unit tests for some of the ad_gpo
> > >
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:29:37PM -0400, Yassir Elley wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:30:15PM -0400, Yassir Elley wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The attached patch adds unit tests for some of the ad_gpo functionality.
> > > It
> > > also fixes some failur
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 07:09:23PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 05/23/2014 07:06 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:00:49PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>On 05/22/2014 11:17 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >>>On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:07:51AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Mon, M
On 05/22/2014 08:40 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 15:31 -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 05/19/2014 01:36 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 05/19/2014 08:28 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 05:55:45PM +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
"ramdisk" is 58x faster then HDD.
"r
On 05/23/2014 07:06 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:00:49PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 05/22/2014 11:17 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:07:51AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:40:40PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 05/16/2014 03:32 PM,
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 09:00:49PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 05/22/2014 11:17 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 11:07:51AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> >>On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:40:40PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> >>>On 05/16/2014 03:32 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri,
- Original Message -
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:30:15PM -0400, Yassir Elley wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The attached patch adds unit tests for some of the ad_gpo functionality. It
> > also fixes some failure mode processing code in ad_gpo.c that was
> > uncovered by the unit tests. This pat
On (23/05/14 17:47), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>ehlo,
>
>In theory, it could be possible to build current master without samba
>on rhel5, but the spec file would be very complicated.
>It is better to simplify spec file.
>
>Patch is attached.
>1 file changed, 43 deletions(-) :-)
>
>LS
The patch lost so
ehlo,
In theory, it could be possible to build current master without samba
on rhel5, but the spec file would be very complicated.
It is better to simplify spec file.
Patch is attached.
1 file changed, 43 deletions(-) :-)
LS
___
sssd-devel mailing list
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 05:03:35PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> Is this preparation for further patches?
> >
> >Yes. This dependency was introduced in commit:
> >commit b1c4a998f8e217b4ba4cd632f5069d479211c22d
> >Author: Yassir Elley
> >Date: Wed May 21 19:58:52 2014 -0400
> >
On (23/05/14 16:59), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:57:06PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (23/05/14 13:28), Sumit Bose wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >I just realized that libsmbclient it not covered by the general
>> >samba-devel package. The patch add the needed BuildRequires to th
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:57:06PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (23/05/14 13:28), Sumit Bose wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I just realized that libsmbclient it not covered by the general
> >samba-devel package. The patch add the needed BuildRequires to the spec
> >file.
> >
> >bye,
> >Sumit
>
> >From
On (23/05/14 13:28), Sumit Bose wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I just realized that libsmbclient it not covered by the general
>samba-devel package. The patch add the needed BuildRequires to the spec
>file.
>
>bye,
>Sumit
>From 6508989d0304dbd8c8c463e7adb955806582f0df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Sumit Bose
>
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 01:28:51PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just realized that libsmbclient it not covered by the general
> samba-devel package. The patch add the needed BuildRequires to the spec
> file.
>
> bye,
> Sumit
ACK
___
sssd-devel
Hi,
I just realized that libsmbclient it not covered by the general
samba-devel package. The patch add the needed BuildRequires to the spec
file.
bye,
Sumit
From 6508989d0304dbd8c8c463e7adb955806582f0df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Bose
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 13:25:32 +0200
Subject: [PAT
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:43:35PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 08:04:51PM -0400, Yassir Elley wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The attached patch adds libsmbclient to the makefiles, in preparation for
> > adding libsmbclient calls to the gpo-smb code. This patch depends on a
> > pre
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 08:04:51PM -0400, Yassir Elley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The attached patch adds libsmbclient to the makefiles, in preparation for
> adding libsmbclient calls to the gpo-smb code. This patch depends on a
> previously submitted patch ("Add ad_gpo unit test"), which has not yet been
On 05/23/2014 12:39 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 05/21/2014 01:20 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 05/19/2014 08:34 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
Yes, I managed not to notice this before, behind other errors, but I get these
too. It seems it is reall a Valgrind issue. I.e. it doesn't seem t
On 05/23/2014 01:00 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 05/23/2014 12:49 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:39:55PM +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 05/21/2014 01:20 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 05/19/2014 08:34 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
Yes, I managed not to notice th
On 05/23/2014 12:49 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:39:55PM +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 05/21/2014 01:20 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 05/19/2014 08:34 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
Yes, I managed not to notice this before, behind other errors, but I get these
too
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 07:52:39PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> On 05/21/2014 10:57 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >The InfoPipe code in master only supports a single interface per
> >responder, which obviously doesn't play well with our grand plans.
> >
> >Pavel, I know you have different plans with m
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 08:31:49AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (21/05/14 22:53), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >the attached patches implement the
> >org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties.GetAll method for retrieving primitive
> >types and their arrays.
> >
> >The patchset build on the previous
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 11:28:13AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 08:09:26PM -0400, Yassir Elley wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 05:03:20PM -0400, Yassir Elley wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > > >
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:39:55PM +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 05/21/2014 01:20 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> >On 05/19/2014 08:34 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> >>Yes, I managed not to notice this before, behind other errors, but I get
> >>these
> >>too. It seems it is reall a Valgri
On 05/21/2014 01:20 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 05/19/2014 08:34 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
Yes, I managed not to notice this before, behind other errors, but I get these
too. It seems it is reall a Valgrind issue. I.e. it doesn't seem to make sense
to apply "--error-exitcode" to child p
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:30:15PM -0400, Yassir Elley wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The attached patch adds unit tests for some of the ad_gpo functionality. It
> also fixes some failure mode processing code in ad_gpo.c that was uncovered
> by the unit tests. This patch depends on a previously submitted patc
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 08:09:26PM -0400, Yassir Elley wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 05:03:20PM -0400, Yassir Elley wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > Hi,
...
>
> I am using code from samba's ndr_security.c, but I only took t
Hello,
I found this warning,
../src/tests/sbus_codegen_tests.c: In function ‘test_vtable’:
../src/tests/sbus_codegen_tests.c:182:5: error: missing initializer for field
‘com_planetexpress_Ship_get_Color’ of ‘struct com_planetexpress_Ship’
[-Werror=missing-field-initializers]
Attached pa
On (22/05/14 17:08), Pavel Reichl wrote:
>Sorry Lukas, but the patches do not apply to master.
>
rebased patches are attached.
LS
>From 39b216012c4bc8d17bb15802c240cc02ec8c06d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Slebodnik
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 23:42:19 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] UTIL: Add func
On (23/05/14 08:31), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (21/05/14 22:53), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>the attached patches implement the
>>org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties.GetAll method for retrieving primitive
>>types and their arrays.
>>
>>The patchset build on the previous set (currently still on revi
33 matches
Mail list logo
