On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 08:40:11AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (02/06/14 18:36), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >another cherry-pick mail, this time with the IFP responder. Only the
> >first patch had to be amended in the conf_macros.m4 and confdb.h files.
> >
> >
> You forgot to cherry-pi
On (02/06/14 18:36), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>Hi,
>
>another cherry-pick mail, this time with the IFP responder. Only the
>first patch had to be amended in the conf_macros.m4 and confdb.h files.
>
>
You forgot to cherry-pick patch
commit 03fb48fdaa7ed95ecb38ecc43a6d221ff2cfd950
Author: Jakub Hrozek
D
Hi,
the DEBUG message was confusing, we attempt to always store the SID, not
only when ID-mapping.
>From 450453eb541ca44ac7d6f67051457e5769c80b74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 11:08:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] LDAP: Fix DEBUG message
---
src/providers/ldap/lda
Please see the attached man page patch that addresses:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2281
>From 2e2253eca96b86db06bc93d3f63a6f6332372756 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 08:14:12 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] MAN: Document that each provider type uses its own set o
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 08:15:36AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (02/06/14 23:19), Sumit Bose wrote:
> >On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 04:59:44PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> ehlo,
> >>
> >> I think that the attached patches are self descriptive.
> >>
> >> LS
> >
> >Patches apply and build fi
On (02/06/14 23:19), Sumit Bose wrote:
>On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 04:59:44PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> ehlo,
>>
>> I think that the attached patches are self descriptive.
>>
>> LS
>
>Patches apply and build fine. I've run build on a few platforms without
>any issue, but I had none with openp
On 06/02/2014 09:37 AM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 05/31/2014 04:45 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
I reworked the design based on the feedback provided.
It is a completely rewritten version.
Please take a look.
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/ding-libs/INIConfigMerge
I'm likely awfully
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 04:59:44PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ehlo,
>
> I think that the attached patches are self descriptive.
>
> LS
Patches apply and build fine. I've run build on a few platforms without
any issue, but I had none with openpam at hand.
I only have one comment on the last
Hi,
I've sent the patches that I want to be included in 1.11.6 /and/ they
need changes to the list already - that's the IFP cherry-pick and LDAP
extension rebase. On top of those, the remaining patches we need for the
IFP responder's functionality can be cleanly applied. The resulting
branch is he
Hi,
this time it's not a straight cherry-pick but a rebase, because starting
with 1.10 the LDAP provider files were split bit differently. But the
code itself is the same, just moved elsewhere.
The attached patches also include fixes we found after we pushed the
original patches.
>From 7b9ad4d28e
Hi,
this is another prerequisite to having the IFP responder in sssd-1-11.
Only Makefile.am had to be changed.
>From ae989d7793117078fa63e67c68eaade71ca38ad6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 14:58:57 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] TESTS: Create a default sss_names_ct
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:34:21AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 01:48:19PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
> > On 04/24/2014 09:37 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > >On (23/04/14 23:38), Michal Židek wrote:
> > >>On 04/22/2014 09:55 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > >>>ehlo,
> > >>>
>
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:49:59AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Ack
Thanks for the review, pushed to master:
9fd8065663084acaf88e7fe10a52c60e9a2a5411
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/ma
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 06:42:05PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 05:16:05PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (02/06/14 10:01), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 07:26:49AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > >> On (01/06/14 19:23), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >>
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 06:27:53PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (02/06/14 17:39), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >the attached patchset cherry-picks the sbus_request patches to
> >sssd-1-11. As with the previous set I sent, I left the conflict messages
> >in the commit headers. There were o
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 03:15:33PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 02:52:50PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> > Thank you Jakub for comments. I proposed new version of text to man
> > pages. I updated 2nd patch and generally speaking returned to solution
> > which I proposed in 1s
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 05:16:05PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (02/06/14 10:01), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 07:26:49AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (01/06/14 19:23), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> >On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:22:05PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> >
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 06:26:54PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (02/06/14 12:18), Simo Sorce wrote:
> >On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 18:15 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 12:01:14PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >> > > We have a ZERO_STRUCT call precisely for this reason.
> >> >
Hi,
another cherry-pick mail, this time with the IFP responder. Only the
first patch had to be amended in the conf_macros.m4 and confdb.h files.
>From 1f5aef524fe51e572b882c744cb8b483b4aed38b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 14:59:35 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] I
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 06:03:45PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (02/06/14 17:35), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >attached are cherry-picked patches that implement Stef's sbus_codegen.
> >
> >Only the first patch in the series had to be rebased in a very trivial
> >way:
> >
> >diff --cc Mak
On (02/06/14 18:27), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 12:18:02PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 18:15 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 12:01:14PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> > > > We have a ZERO_STRUCT call precisely for this reason.
>> > >
>>
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 12:18:02PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 18:15 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 12:01:14PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > > We have a ZERO_STRUCT call precisely for this reason.
> > >
> > > If it is on the stack, we can simply declar
On (02/06/14 17:39), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>Hi,
>
>the attached patchset cherry-picks the sbus_request patches to
>sssd-1-11. As with the previous set I sent, I left the conflict messages
>in the commit headers. There were only two conflicts, one in the
>Makefile (tests again) and one trivial in #inc
On (02/06/14 12:18), Simo Sorce wrote:
>On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 18:15 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 12:01:14PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> > > We have a ZERO_STRUCT call precisely for this reason.
>> >
>> > If it is on the stack, we can simply declare it with a C99 initialize
On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 18:15 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 12:01:14PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > We have a ZERO_STRUCT call precisely for this reason.
> >
> > If it is on the stack, we can simply declare it with a C99 initializer
> > of 0 ?
> > Or is this structure reused
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 12:01:14PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > We have a ZERO_STRUCT call precisely for this reason.
>
> If it is on the stack, we can simply declare it with a C99 initializer
> of 0 ?
> Or is this structure reused (hence needs resetting) more than once ?
>
> Simo.
btw both clan
On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 18:06 +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (02/06/14 12:01), Simo Sorce wrote:
> >On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 10:01 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 07:26:49AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> > On (01/06/14 19:23), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> > >On Wed, May 28,
On (02/06/14 12:01), Simo Sorce wrote:
>On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 10:01 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 07:26:49AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > On (01/06/14 19:23), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> > >On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:22:05PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > >> On (27/05/1
On (02/06/14 17:35), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>Hi,
>
>attached are cherry-picked patches that implement Stef's sbus_codegen.
>
>Only the first patch in the series had to be rebased in a very trivial
>way:
>
>diff --cc Makefile.am
>index 8d92326,d7e6243..000
>--- a/Makefile.am
>+++ b/Makefile.am
>@@@
On Mon, 2014-06-02 at 10:01 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 07:26:49AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (01/06/14 19:23), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:22:05PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > >> On (27/05/14 16:32), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >> >On Tue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon 02 Jun 2014 09:13:32 AM EDT, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 08:22:14AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 06/01/2014 04:09 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 30, 2014
On (02/06/14 10:01), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 07:26:49AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (01/06/14 19:23), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:22:05PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >> On (27/05/14 16:32), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >> >On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 0
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 10:24:22AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you might have noticed already, we're pushing 1.11 and its AD related
> improvements to older releases as well, including RHEL-6. These
> platforms are supposed to be /stable/.
>
> I've been thinking about how exactly shou
On 05/31/2014 04:45 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
I reworked the design based on the feedback provided.
It is a completely rewritten version.
Please take a look.
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/ding-libs/INIConfigMerge
I'm likely awfully under-informed (I haven't seen any prior discussion
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 02:52:50PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> Thank you Jakub for comments. I proposed new version of text to man
> pages. I updated 2nd patch and generally speaking returned to solution
> which I proposed in 1st or 2nd iteration of this patches. But this time
> I traded off code
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 08:22:14AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/01/2014 04:09 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:04:01PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >> OK, please see updated patch. PR
> >
> > Thank you, from cont
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/01/2014 04:09 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:04:01PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>> OK, please see updated patch. PR
>
> Thank you, from content point of view, this looks correct to me.
>
> Can you please ping some native E
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 12:27:34PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (02/06/14 11:03), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >see attached patch. The bug was preventing SSSD from being built on ARM
> >(reproduced on a Raspberri Pi, for example).
>
> >From 86f9acd3579c36fe4b198b8ec63b364620eee6e2 Mon S
On (02/06/14 11:03), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>Hi,
>
>see attached patch. The bug was preventing SSSD from being built on ARM
>(reproduced on a Raspberri Pi, for example).
>From 86f9acd3579c36fe4b198b8ec63b364620eee6e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Jakub Hrozek
>Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:59:46 +0200
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 09:41:51PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 01:47:10PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > please see attached patch solving
> > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2334
> >
> > Patch applies to both master and 1.11.
> >
> > PR
>
> ACK.
>
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 10:10:20AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:09:13PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have summarized a thread on this list and added some additional
> > information on
> > https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/NSSWithKerberosPrincipa
Hi,
see attached patch. The bug was preventing SSSD from being built on ARM
(reproduced on a Raspberri Pi, for example).
>From 86f9acd3579c36fe4b198b8ec63b364620eee6e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 10:59:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] TESTS: fgetc returns int, not c
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:09:13PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have summarized a thread on this list and added some additional
> information on
> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/NSSWithKerberosPrincipal
>
> For your convenience the text can be found below as well. Comments
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 07:26:49AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (01/06/14 19:23), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 06:22:05PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (27/05/14 16:32), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> >On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 01:03:42PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >> >> O
44 matches
Mail list logo