On 09/16/2014 10:53 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
From 4b20f833f71c9014b0874b5a899d71f0bdbf9ca3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Slebodnik
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 12:00:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] CI: Do not try to find memory leaks with valgrind
We use talloc and valgrind needn't find memory leak
On (16/09/14 17:00), Simo Sorce wrote:
>On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:53:56 +0200
>Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>
>> On (02/09/14 15:38), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >On (02/09/14 14:23), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>> >>On 09/02/2014 02:13 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >>>On (02/09/14 13:27), Nikolai Kondrashov w
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:53:56 +0200
Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (02/09/14 15:38), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >On (02/09/14 14:23), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> >>On 09/02/2014 02:13 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>>On (02/09/14 13:27), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 09/02/2014 01:02 PM, Lukas Sleb
On (02/09/14 15:38), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (02/09/14 14:23), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>>On 09/02/2014 02:13 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>On (02/09/14 13:27), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 09/02/2014 01:02 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>We use talloc and valgrind needn't find memory leaks
Hi,
I came across this when trying to resolve the SID of a group with the
group's name.
bye,
Sumit
From c26f19e3d3cca24e45ed36e395693862f5e1664f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Bose
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 17:40:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] sysdb: sysdb_search_group_by_name should work like
sy
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 08:01:18PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
> On 09/08/2014 10:15 AM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> >On 09/08/2014 10:42 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>Fix for one problem is attached. (missing dependency: make)
> >
> >I don't have a freshly-installed Debian handy to verify this pro
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 08:07:09PM +0200, Michal Židek wrote:
> On 09/03/2014 10:36 AM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> >Hi everyone,
> >
> >This patch adds preserving of mock configuration timestamps, so mock root
> >cache is not rebuilt unnecessarily, shaving off about a minute of CI run
> >time.
> >
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 02:25:11PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 03:39:24PM +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > These patches fix a few test memory leaks detected by Valgrind.
> >
> > While these are not important for test functionality, fixing them wi
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 03:39:24PM +0300, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> These patches fix a few test memory leaks detected by Valgrind.
>
> While these are not important for test functionality, fixing them will let us
> keep Valgrind reports clean and enable binary Valgrind test re
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 03:33:14PM +0200, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>
> On 09/15/2014 03:02 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >please see the attached patch and its commit message. An alternative
> >might be to use a different variable for the result (as we did in 1.9)
> >before the new error codes.
On 09/15/2014 08:04 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 09/12/2014 06:18 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (12/09/14 16:43), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>>> On 09/12/2014 10:22 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (11/09/14 23:09), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 09/11/2014 09:16 PM, Lukas Slebodnik w
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 01:00:12PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:03:33PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 05:54:59PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I found this while testing other stuff.
> > >
> > > bye,
> > > Sumit
> >
> > The patch
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:03:33PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 05:54:59PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I found this while testing other stuff.
> >
> > bye,
> > Sumit
>
> The patch works as expected, so ACK. I will just fix one DEBUG message
> before pushing i
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 05:54:59PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found this while testing other stuff.
>
> bye,
> Sumit
The patch works as expected, so ACK. I will just fix one DEBUG message
before pushing if you don't mind, see inline.
Also, while testing I realized that when looking up
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:10:38AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (16/09/14 10:24), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 06:42:45PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I think we have all the patches for 1.11.7 in. Can we tag and release
> >> it?
> >
> >Unless there's a 'no
On (16/09/14 10:24), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 06:42:45PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think we have all the patches for 1.11.7 in. Can we tag and release
>> it?
>
>Unless there's a 'no' vote I'll tag and release 1.11.7 tomorrow, Wed
>17th.
It seems taht ticket #238
Reported by Scott Poore.
>From 22c5680aa75078418c9e4f99794b96e476bb4800 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:07:29 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] MAN: AD is allowed value of subdomains_provider
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2442
---
src/man/sssd.conf.5.xml | 9 +++
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 06:42:45PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think we have all the patches for 1.11.7 in. Can we tag and release
> it?
Unless there's a 'no' vote I'll tag and release 1.11.7 tomorrow, Wed
17th.
___
sssd-devel mailing list
ss
On 09/15/2014 10:57 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (02/09/14 15:38), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (02/09/14 14:23), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 09/02/2014 02:13 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (02/09/14 13:27), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 09/02/2014 01:02 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
We use talloc
19 matches
Mail list logo
