On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 06:04:19PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 12/05/2014 05:54 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> >On 12/05/2014 11:03 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>+# long-standing memory leak in popt
> >>+{
> >>+ popt-memleak-from-poptGetNextOpt-realloc
> >>+ Memcheck:Leak
> >>+ match
On 12/05/2014 10:31 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 11:43:02PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (04/12/14 22:50), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
caught by CI..
>From 507aa36664640ac187f1289889c9ceb7bd944b0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Hrozek
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 18:04:35 +010
On 12/05/2014 05:54 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 12/05/2014 11:03 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
+# long-standing memory leak in popt
+{
+ popt-memleak-from-poptGetNextOpt-realloc
+ Memcheck:Leak
+ match-leak-kinds: definite
Old versions of Valgrind (including the one in RHEL6) don't differ
On 12/05/2014 11:03 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
+# long-standing memory leak in popt
+{
+ popt-memleak-from-poptGetNextOpt-realloc
+ Memcheck:Leak
+ match-leak-kinds: definite
Old versions of Valgrind (including the one in RHEL6) don't differentiate leak
confidence and abort on encountering t
On (05/12/14 16:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 02:14:27PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (24/11/14 10:47), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 09:51:58AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >> On (22/11/14 17:25), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >> >On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 0
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 02:14:27PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (24/11/14 10:47), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 09:51:58AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (22/11/14 17:25), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> >On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 05:12:09PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> >> O
There is a typo in the *subject*. The correct version we released is *1.9.7*
- Original Message -
From: "Jakub Hrozek"
To: sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org, sssd-us...@lists.fedorahosted.org,
freeipa-inter...@redhat.com
Sent: Friday, December 5, 2014 2:10:45 PM
Subject: Announcing SSSD
Hi,
since we released the last 1.9.x release today, I think it would be
prudent to also relase the 1.11.8 tarball so that 1.9.x users can
migrate to 1.11.x without being hit by known and fixed issues.
Are there any fixes we'd like to see in the 1.11.8 release? I propose
these two:
* 6a3ec7b L
=== SSSD 1.9.7 ===
The SSSD team is proud to announce the release of version 1.9.7 of
the System Security Services Daemon.
Most importantly, SSSD 1.9.7 is the last planned release of the LTM
sssd-1-9 branch. User of SSSD 1.9.x are advised to upgrade to SSSD 1.11.x
which wil
On 12/04/2014 05:47 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 12/03/2014 05:27 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
On 11/24/2014 12:41 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 11/21/2014 03:52 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
On 11/21/2014 03:17 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 11/21/2014 03:02 PM, Michal Židek wrote:
On 11/21/2014 12:37 PM, P
Hi,
with the copy_keytab patch I added a call to krb5_kt_have_content()
which is only available in MIT Kerberos 1.11 and newer. This patch adds
a wrapper call.
bye,
Sumit
From 8ff83e6f82531f177fc6b9c10d0d218ec370c5e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Bose
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 13:23:12 +0100
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 10:06:10PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 09:48:01PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to release sssd-1.9.7 by the end of this week and then
> > switch the LTS version to sssd-1-11 and proclaim the sssd-1-9 series
> > EOL.
> >
>
On (13/11/14 12:24), Pavel Reichl wrote:
>On 06/04/2014 07:49 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>>On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 16:11 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>>On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:58:20AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 08:42:21AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 a
On 11/13/2014 12:24 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 06/04/2014 07:49 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 16:11 +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 09:58:20AM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 08:42:21AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 04
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 09:55:11AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (04/12/14 22:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 11:09:30AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (03/12/14 22:00), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> >On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 09:15:45PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> >
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 12:40:00AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (04/12/14 22:53), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Using this patch and the one that Lukas has pending on the list, the only
> >error in CI is the RHEL-6 build failure:
> >http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/4/70/summary.htm
On (04/12/14 22:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 11:09:30AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (03/12/14 22:00), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 09:15:45PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >> On (03/12/14 21:44), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>> >> >On 12/03/2014 07:23
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 11:43:02PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (04/12/14 22:50), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >caught by CI..
>
> >From 507aa36664640ac187f1289889c9ceb7bd944b0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >From: Jakub Hrozek
> >Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 18:04:35 +0100
> >Subject: [PATCH] tests: Free p
18 matches
Mail list logo