On 12/17/2014 08:48 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 12/17/2014 01:37 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 12/17/2014 08:15 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
If we do something in the area we should consider the config DB and config file
refactoring we have on our plate anyways.
IMO it would make sense to pass a path
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 04:40:53PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 04:07:42PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (16/12/14 10:47), Sumit Bose wrote:
> > >On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:41:25AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > >> On (12/12/14 11:04), Sumit Bose wrote:
> > >> >Hi,
>
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 05:25:14PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (11/12/14 11:00), Sumit Bose wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >this is the fix for https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2514 and has a
> >fix for a related issue as well.
> >
> >bye,
> >Sumit
>
> >From 3496396e440377bca34887c0b271beb67db7c01
On 12/17/2014 01:37 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 12/17/2014 08:15 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 12/17/2014 01:06 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 12/17/2014 07:37 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (17/12/14 19:11), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 12/17/2014 06:44 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
You can u
On 12/17/2014 08:15 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 12/17/2014 01:06 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 12/17/2014 07:37 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (17/12/14 19:11), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 12/17/2014 06:44 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
You can use different prefix even with make check.
Sure, b
On 12/17/2014 01:06 PM, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 12/17/2014 07:37 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (17/12/14 19:11), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 12/17/2014 06:44 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
You can use different prefix even with make check.
Sure, but then it won't be just any "make check" a
On 12/17/2014 07:37 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (17/12/14 19:11), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
On 12/17/2014 06:44 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
You can use different prefix even with make check.
Sure, but then it won't be just any "make check" anymore. It will require a
special "configure" invoc
On (17/12/14 19:11), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>On 12/17/2014 06:44 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>You can use different prefix even with make check.
>
>Sure, but then it won't be just any "make check" anymore. It will require a
>special "configure" invocation to work.
>
>>"make distcheck" uses it in
On 11/28/2014 02:08 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (28/11/14 12:01), Sumit Bose wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 03:09:32PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
Hi everyone,
While trying to arrange running sssd under cwrap in "make check" I came upon
this roadblock:
There doesn't seem to be a way to
On 12/17/2014 06:44 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
You can use different prefix even with make check.
Sure, but then it won't be just any "make check" anymore. It will require a
special "configure" invocation to work.
"make distcheck" uses it in such way. It doesn't make sense to reinvent wheel.
On (17/12/14 18:23), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>Hi everyone,
>
>In order to run integration tests as non-root we would need to have all data
>directories and files to reside in a user-writeable (temporary) directory.
>
>However, it seems that various sssd data directory and file locations are
>spre
On (11/12/14 11:00), Sumit Bose wrote:
>Hi,
>
>this is the fix for https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2514 and has a
>fix for a related issue as well.
>
>bye,
>Sumit
>From 3496396e440377bca34887c0b271beb67db7c01d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Sumit Bose
>Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 21:10:01 +0100
>
Hi everyone,
In order to run integration tests as non-root we would need to have all data
directories and files to reside in a user-writeable (temporary) directory.
However, it seems that various sssd data directory and file locations are
spread over the code as preprocessor macros, resulting in
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 04:07:42PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (16/12/14 10:47), Sumit Bose wrote:
> >On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:41:25AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (12/12/14 11:04), Sumit Bose wrote:
> >> >Hi,
> >> >
> >> >This patch tries to assure on IPA clients that users from
On (16/12/14 10:47), Sumit Bose wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:41:25AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (12/12/14 11:04), Sumit Bose wrote:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >This patch tries to assure on IPA clients that users from trusted
>> >domains are really belong ot all groups they are member of and sh
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 03:53:47PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (17/12/14 09:55), Sumit Bose wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >this patch should fix https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2535 .
> >
> >bye,
> >Sumit
>
> >From 4efbcd9970de72e9661971f9eb8d51c1ed43c078 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >From: Sumit
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 03:47:05PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (17/12/14 15:27), Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >
> >On 12/15/2014 12:15 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >>
> >>On 12/15/2014 10:12 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>>On (12/12/14 17:10), Pavel Reichl wrote:
> On 12/12/2014 04:10 PM, Lukas Sl
On (17/12/14 09:55), Sumit Bose wrote:
>Hi,
>
>this patch should fix https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2535 .
>
>bye,
>Sumit
>From 4efbcd9970de72e9661971f9eb8d51c1ed43c078 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Sumit Bose
>Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:42:57 +0100
>Subject: [PATCH] krb5: handle KRB5KRB_E
On (17/12/14 15:27), Pavel Reichl wrote:
>
>On 12/15/2014 12:15 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>>
>>On 12/15/2014 10:12 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>>On (12/12/14 17:10), Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 12/12/2014 04:10 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (12/12/14 16:04), Pavel Reichl wrote:
>>On 12/12/201
On 12/15/2014 12:15 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 12/15/2014 10:12 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (12/12/14 17:10), Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 12/12/2014 04:10 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (12/12/14 16:04), Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 12/12/2014 03:52 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (12/12/14 15:25), Pa
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 10:55:14AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 09:25:18AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > ehlo,
> >
> > Attached patch fixes regression https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2526
> >
> > I hope there isn't problem with initialisation of REALM in privileged
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 09:33:32AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (17/12/14 09:31), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >On (11/12/14 11:10), Sumit Bose wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>this patch set contains some improvements for the view related code on
> >>IPA client. Most of them are performance related, patc
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 09:32:55AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (11/12/14 11:21), Sumit Bose wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >these two patches add a missing part to
> >https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2481 (ID Views implementation does
> >not support IPA user&group overrides). Since it is not allowe
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 09:25:18AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ehlo,
>
> Attached patch fixes regression https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2526
>
> I hope there isn't problem with initialisation of REALM in privileged code.
>
> LS
Thank you for the patch. ACK
bye,
Sumit
Hi,
Patch 0001:
Moves few object path functions from IFP to sbus.
Patch 0002:
Adds a new function that retrieves unescaped object name.
Patch 0003:
Fixes a potential memory leak.
From 4d43661b4fb65e61407f370a44d7ce3d1d922da0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Pavel=20B=C5=99ezina?=
Date:
Hi,
this patch should fix https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2535 .
bye,
Sumit
From 4efbcd9970de72e9661971f9eb8d51c1ed43c078 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Bose
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:42:57 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] krb5: handle KRB5KRB_ERR_GENERIC as unspecific error
KRB5KRB_ERR_GENERI
On (17/12/14 09:31), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (11/12/14 11:10), Sumit Bose wrote:
>>Hi,
>>
>>this patch set contains some improvements for the view related code on
>>IPA client. Most of them are performance related, patches 4,5 and 6 make
>>sure that during group requests all members are properly
On (11/12/14 11:21), Sumit Bose wrote:
>Hi,
>
>these two patches add a missing part to
>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2481 (ID Views implementation does
>not support IPA user&group overrides). Since it is not allowed to have
>ghost members if a non-default view is applied because otherwise u
On (11/12/14 11:10), Sumit Bose wrote:
>Hi,
>
>this patch set contains some improvements for the view related code on
>IPA client. Most of them are performance related, patches 4,5 and 6 make
>sure that during group requests all members are properly resovled if a
>non-default view is applied to be
ehlo,
Attached patch fixes regression https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2526
I hope there isn't problem with initialisation of REALM in privileged code.
LS
>From 4466974b11a44d0a50cdc90d8ed778697d56d577 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Slebodnik
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:10:33 +0100
Subj
30 matches
Mail list logo
