The API is missing user_attributes in the ifp section.
rob
>From 5ee6860e925bf81a4af4d2559a02dbcc0a197236 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rob Crittenden
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:14:40 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Add user_attributes to ifp section of API schema
Resolves: https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 01:35:03PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 19:32 +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > ehlo,
> >
> > attached is a simple patch for ticket #2572
> >
> > My reproducer:
> > * start sssd
> > * attach gdb to some service e.g. nss
> > - DO NOT
On Thu, 2015-02-12 at 19:32 +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ehlo,
>
> attached is a simple patch for ticket #2572
>
> My reproducer:
> * start sssd
> * attach gdb to some service e.g. nss
> - DO NOT RUN any command (we just need to simulate unresponsive service)
> * wait until monitor send
ehlo,
attached is a simple patch for ticket #2572
My reproducer:
* start sssd
* attach gdb to some service e.g. nss
- DO NOT RUN any command (we just need to simulate unresponsive service)
* wait until monitor send SIGKILL to service
"[nss][5835] is not responding to SIGTERM. Sending SIGKI
- Original Message -
> From: "Dan Lavu"
> To: "Development of the System Security Services Daemon"
>
> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 11:22:53 AM
> Subject: Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] MAN: libkrb5 and SSSD use different expansions
>
> Oooof... I tried digest mode so I can get a better overvie
On 01/28/2015 09:29 AM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 01/27/2015 08:35 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
*/
if (getuid() != 0) {
-setuid(0);
+errno = 0;
I don't think we need to null errno in this case
+ret = setuid(0);
+if (ret == -1) {
+ret = errno;
On 02/11/2015 05:50 PM, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 04:56:48PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hello,
please see attached patch. I'm not sure whether using pam_strerror() is the
right thing to do. It might be better to use our own string?
I'm also not sure about using _(STRING) macro
On 02/10/2015 11:36 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (02/02/15 13:32), Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 02/02/2015 09:08 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
[...]
Patch 1/5: Note that even under Python 2, `except ValueError, KeyError:`
would not work (it catches ValueError, and stores the exception instance
under t
On 02/11/2015 08:23 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 02:08:54PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
2/3 of previous sbus changes are acked so I'm sending few more patches from
my tree.
Commit messages should be sufficient to justify the changes. Simply put, I
wanted to standardize and sh
- Original Message -
> From: "Sumit Bose"
> To: sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 5:50:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] PAM: do not reject abruptly
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 04:56:48PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > please see at
- Original Message -
> From: "Jakub Hrozek"
> To: sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 8:35:20 PM
> Subject: [SSSD] [PATCH] SELINUX: Check the return value of setuid and setgid
>
> Hi,
>
> As the automated test tools of our downstream discovered, selinux_
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 06:07:39PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 05:50:50PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 04:56:48PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > please see attached patch. I'm not sure whether using pam_strerror() is
> > > the
On 02/11/2015 02:13 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:19:52PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 01/21/2015 10:42 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 04:31:24PM -0500, Pavel Brezina wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Jakub Hrozek"
To: sssd-devel@lists.fedor
On 02/11/2015 09:13 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 05:04:09PM +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 01/27/2015 02:19 PM, Pavel Březina wrote:
Hi,
these patches were created as part of my dbus work however they do not
depend on it. Those patches can be applied on top of current master
14 matches
Mail list logo
