Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] RFC: Support both cmocka 1.0 and pre-1.0 API at the same time

2015-02-24 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 09:16:09PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > On (24/02/15 19:52), Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 05:52:26PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > >> On (24/02/15 16:55), Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >> >Hi, > >> > > >> >the attached two patches add a way to detect pre-1.0 c

Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] BUILD: Add possibility to build python{2, 3} bindings

2015-02-24 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 11:10 +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > On (24/02/15 01:26), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > > On (18/02/15 16:36), Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 23:40 +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > > > > ehlo, > > > > > > > > Attached patches: > > > > * d

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] RFC: Support both cmocka 1.0 and pre-1.0 API at the same time

2015-02-24 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (24/02/15 19:52), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 05:52:26PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >> On (24/02/15 16:55), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >> >Hi, >> > >> >the attached two patches add a way to detect pre-1.0 cmocka and adds >> >compatible definitions in the first patch and uses them to

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] RFC: Support both cmocka 1.0 and pre-1.0 API at the same time

2015-02-24 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 05:52:26PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > On (24/02/15 16:55), Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >Hi, > > > >the attached two patches add a way to detect pre-1.0 cmocka and adds > >compatible definitions in the first patch and uses them to convert a > >single unit test. > > > >I found

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] RFC: Support both cmocka 1.0 and pre-1.0 API at the same time

2015-02-24 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (24/02/15 16:55), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >Hi, > >the attached two patches add a way to detect pre-1.0 cmocka and adds >compatible definitions in the first patch and uses them to convert a >single unit test. > >I found the approach ugly myself, so much that I'm considering converting >all cmocka-bas

[SSSD] [PATCH] RFC: Support both cmocka 1.0 and pre-1.0 API at the same time

2015-02-24 Thread Jakub Hrozek
Hi, the attached two patches add a way to detect pre-1.0 cmocka and adds compatible definitions in the first patch and uses them to convert a single unit test. I found the approach ugly myself, so much that I'm considering converting all cmocka-based tests to cmocka-1.0 and don't compile the cmoc

[SSSD] [PATCH] Add YouCompleteMe config to .gitignore

2015-02-24 Thread Jakub Hrozek
Hi, see the attached trivial patch. As a heavy YCM user, I'd appreciate an ACK (and I'm looking forward for Lukas' JSON compilation database!) >From d38ab4ebcf267356a400af89144d665e5c11ecf1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jakub Hrozek Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:05:20 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Add YouC

Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] SDAP: enable change phase of pw expire policy check

2015-02-24 Thread Pavel Reichl
On 02/23/2015 11:47 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 02:44:45PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote: On 02/20/2015 02:33 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: On (20/02/15 14:23), Pavel Reichl wrote: On 02/19/2015 06:16 PM, Sumit Bose wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:56:43PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wro

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] PAM: print the pam status as string, too

2015-02-24 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 02:20:23AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > On (23/02/15 14:58), Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 01:46:06PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > >> IMHO we should print it all the time. > > > >Sure, why not. I added to message to the PAM responder mainly because it

Re: [SSSD] [PATCHES] BUILD: Add possibility to build python{2, 3} bindings

2015-02-24 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (24/02/15 01:26), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >On (18/02/15 16:36), Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >> >> >>On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 23:40 +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >>> ehlo, >>> >>> Attached patches: >>> * drop support for python < 2.6 >>> * fix packaging of binding (backward incompatible change) >>>