On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 05:03:03PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> On 03/23/2015 03:59 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >On (23/03/15 14:47), Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>On 03/23/2015 02:43 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>>On (23/03/15 14:18), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 0
On 03/23/2015 03:59 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (23/03/15 14:47), Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 03/23/2015 02:43 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (23/03/15 14:18), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:07:12PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo,
simple patch is attached.
LS
Hm, the defa
On 03/23/2015 02:59 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (23/03/15 14:47), Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 03/23/2015 02:43 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (23/03/15 14:18), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:07:12PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo,
simple patch is attached.
LS
Hm, the def
On (23/03/15 14:47), Pavel Reichl wrote:
>
>
>On 03/23/2015 02:43 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>On (23/03/15 14:18), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>>On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:07:12PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo,
simple patch is attached.
LS
>>>Hm, the default CI test doesn't run
On 03/23/2015 02:43 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (23/03/15 14:18), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:07:12PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
ehlo,
simple patch is attached.
LS
Hm, the default CI test doesn't run distcheck?
I admit I haven't ran distcheck myself, but was relyin
On (23/03/15 14:18), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:07:12PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> ehlo,
>>
>> simple patch is attached.
>>
>> LS
>
>Hm, the default CI test doesn't run distcheck?
>
>I admit I haven't ran distcheck myself, but was relying on the CI link
>Pavel sent..
T
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:18:40PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:07:12PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > ehlo,
> >
> > simple patch is attached.
> >
> > LS
>
> Hm, the default CI test doesn't run distcheck?
>
> I admit I haven't ran distcheck myself, but was relying
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:07:12PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ehlo,
>
> simple patch is attached.
>
> LS
Hm, the default CI test doesn't run distcheck?
I admit I haven't ran distcheck myself, but was relying on the CI link
Pavel sent..
___
sssd-d
ehlo,
simple patch is attached.
LS
>From c6a4f4d9707aac3401f602c6042c1620ef2d961a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Slebodnik
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:04:28 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] BUILD: Add missing header file to tarball
make distcheck failed due to missing header file.
../src/tests/cmo
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:06:12PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:48:59AM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> > >> From 4236caecdc9981d10f777e90a65aa60cd92445df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > >>From: Pavel Reichl
> > >>Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 04:29:24 -0500
> > >>Subject: [PATCH 1/3]
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:48:59AM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >> From 4236caecdc9981d10f777e90a65aa60cd92445df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >>From: Pavel Reichl
> >>Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 04:29:24 -0500
> >>Subject: [PATCH 1/3] TESTS: test expiration
> >Sorry, more nitpicks. I should have sent them
On 03/23/2015 11:12 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 07:13:37PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
Hi everyone,
This is my attempt to add basic integration tests. There are almost no tests
there at the moment and this is mostly about the infrastructure and the way we
might do it.
ci passed:
http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/11/40/summary.html
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
On 03/20/2015 06:44 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 04:58:38PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 03/20/2015 03:26 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 01:13:35PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
I wonder why didn't you create a single pwexpire test instead? The file
names are
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 09:52:29AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> I will just fix this comment before pushing. Otherwise ACK.
>
> > +msg->num_elements = 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > mod_ctx->igh->mod_msg = msg;
> > mod_ctx->igh->el = el;
> >
> > --
> > 2.3.2
> >
* master: 999c87114
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 07:13:37PM +0200, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This is my attempt to add basic integration tests. There are almost no tests
> there at the moment and this is mostly about the infrastructure and the way we
> might do it.
>
> I will be glad to answer any ques
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 09:59:03AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ehlo,
>
> at first I thought it is related to ticket "#2576"
> but after simplification of reproducer I found out it just looks
> bad in log file.
>
> ldb failed to add attribute with 0 values to ldb entry, but it would not have
>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 03:03:14PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> On 03/10/2015 02:50 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 02:16:52PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>the attached patches resolve https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1501
> >>
> >>They were confirmed to work b
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 06:54:32PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:38:40AM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> > >sssd-devel mailing list
> > >sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> > >https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
> > ci passed:
> >
> > http://sssd-ci.du
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 07:48:34PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 06:52:17PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 06:47:09PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > this patch should fix a segfault which was recently found in the GPO
> > > code.
> > >
20 matches
Mail list logo
