On (09/02/16 08:17), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 02:30:36PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>> Hello, please see trivial patch attached. Thanks.
>
>> From 6d5f6b71c2d2f891470dc1c9f08ae67f5b6c02f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Pavel Reichl
>> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 08:27:01 -0500
>>
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 08:20:38AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (09/02/16 08:15), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 08:09:33AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> On (08/02/16 13:56), Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >> >On 02/08/2016 10:48 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> >>On Mon, Feb 08, 2016
On (09/02/16 08:15), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 08:09:33AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (08/02/16 13:56), Pavel Reichl wrote:
>> >On 02/08/2016 10:48 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >>On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:34:16AM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>On 02/05/2016
Hello Jakub.
Thank you!
As of now SSSD is pretty much the most stable software I'm working with, so no
extra patches from me at this moment.
Have a nice day!
Kind regards,
Howard
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 03:07:21PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (1
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 02:30:36PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> Hello, please see trivial patch attached. Thanks.
> From 6d5f6b71c2d2f891470dc1c9f08ae67f5b6c02f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Pavel Reichl
> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 08:27:01 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] PAM: Clarify man page for doma
On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 08:09:33AM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (08/02/16 13:56), Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >On 02/08/2016 10:48 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:34:16AM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On 02/05/2016 03:16 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >
>
On (08/02/16 17:18), Sumit Bose wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:18:56PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (08/02/16 12:12), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >On (08/02/16 10:48), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >>On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:34:16AM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 02/05/201
On (08/02/16 13:56), Pavel Reichl wrote:
>On 02/08/2016 10:48 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:34:16AM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>On 02/05/2016 03:16 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>
The ticket is about "SSSD should be about to display message to the user
whe
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 01:56:07PM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>
>
> On 02/08/2016 10:48 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:34:16AM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>On 02/05/2016 03:16 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>
> >>>The ticket is about "SSSD should be about to di
On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 03:07:21PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (19/06/15 14:26), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:49:10PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> ehlo,
> >>
> >> We have 19 patches in 1.11 branch on top of latest release (1.11.7)
> >> I went through bugs filed ag
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 06:57:56PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
> On 01/28/2016 04:48 PM, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >Hello, please see trivial patch attached. Thanks
> >
>
> ACK.
>
> CI link:
> http://sssd-ci.duckdns.org/logs/job/36/90/summary.html
* master: 1fedb90a1d67766da39783eb193f568e9e2d55b0
__
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 09:09:56PM +0100, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
> Yes, ACK :)
* master: bf472d2422599d14345e7cd289c26455c622
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists
On 02/08/2016 04:48 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (08/02/16 16:16), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
Hi Lukas,
On 02/08/2016 04:06 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
The /usr/lib64 should be preffered path for searching
binary modules for openldap backends. The/usr/lib/ should
be used for storing no binary
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 04:18:56PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (08/02/16 12:12), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >On (08/02/16 10:48), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:34:16AM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 02/05/2016 03:16 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>> >>
>
On (08/02/16 16:16), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote:
>Hi Lukas,
>
>On 02/08/2016 04:06 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>The /usr/lib64 should be preffered path for searching
>>binary modules for openldap backends. The/usr/lib/ should
>>be used for storing no binary files on 64 bit platform
>>e.g. scripts ..
On (08/02/16 12:12), Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>On (08/02/16 10:48), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:34:16AM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/05/2016 03:16 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >The ticket is about "SSSD should be about to display message to the user
>>
Hi Lukas,
On 02/08/2016 04:06 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
The /usr/lib64 should be preffered path for searching
binary modules for openldap backends. The/usr/lib/ should
be used for storing no binary files on 64 bit platform
e.g. scripts ...
The current vresion of would choose/usr/lib/ even tho
ehlo,
simple patch is attached.
LS
>From 3521c1a16887ab18c3c618cfef6d69dd2f94d8b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Slebodnik
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:11:19 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] intg: Change preference of openldap module path
The /usr/lib64 should be preffered path for searching
binary mod
On 02/08/2016 10:48 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:34:16AM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
On 02/05/2016 03:16 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
The ticket is about "SSSD should be about to display message to the user when
the account in Active Directory is 'locked out'"
If the s
On (08/02/16 10:48), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:34:16AM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 02/05/2016 03:16 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >>
>> >The ticket is about "SSSD should be about to display message to the user
>> >when
>> >the account in Active Directory is 'lock
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:34:16AM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>
>
> On 02/05/2016 03:16 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>
> >The ticket is about "SSSD should be about to display message to the user when
> >the account in Active Directory is 'locked out'"
> >
> >If the string is not standardized amo
On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:34:16AM +0100, Pavel Reichl wrote:
>
>
> On 02/05/2016 03:16 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >>
> >The ticket is about "SSSD should be about to display message to the user when
> >the account in Active Directory is 'locked out'"
> >
> >If the string is not standardized amo
On 02/05/2016 03:16 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
The ticket is about "SSSD should be about to display message to the user when
the account in Active Directory is 'locked out'"
If the string is not standardized among AD versions
than this ticket is NOT solved.
So what do you propose? Rename t
On 02/05/2016 03:42 PM, Dan Lavu wrote:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc526636.aspx
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/218185
?
Dan, I might have missed it but I don't see there any mention of AD returning
'data 775' in case that account is locked (which is a sub case of
On 02/05/2016 10:25 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (05/02/16 19:34), Michal Židek wrote:
On 02/05/2016 06:32 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (05/02/16 17:30), Michal Židek wrote:
On 02/05/2016 05:13 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (05/02/16 16:56), Pavel Reichl wrote:
Hopefully the last one.
25 matches
Mail list logo