[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] CI: Use make check instead of make-check-wrap

2016-03-31 Thread Nikolai Kondrashov
On 03/31/2016 05:02 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: On (31/03/16 15:06), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote: BTW bew version with "LOG_COMPILER=true" is more obvious than old version "-- true" Sure, as long as you know how the value of "LOG_COMPILER" is used :) Updated version is attached. http://sssd-ci.d

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] CI: Use make check instead of make-check-wrap

2016-03-31 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (31/03/16 15:06), Nikolai Kondrashov wrote: >Hi Lukas, > >On 03/31/2016 02:41 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >>ehlo, >> >>the 1st patch is prerequisite for the 2nd patch >>and it also speed up build on rhel6. >> >>The second patch simplify some magic in CI script. > >The idea is fine with me and is

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH SET] TOOL: Invalidation of sudo rules at sss_cache

2016-03-31 Thread Pavel Březina
On 03/29/2016 03:17 PM, Petr Cech wrote: My big challenge is test_filter_rules_by_time(). I recognize that we don't have function for load sudo rule by name. I mean how to obtain struct sysdb_attrs *rule, for example by name of rule. If I understand it rigt, we just prepare filter and we say (in

[SSSD] Design discussion: Use fully-qualified names for users and groups in sysdb

2016-03-31 Thread Jakub Hrozek
Hi, I prepared a design page for https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2011 at: https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/SysdbFullyQualifiedNames For your convenience, the text is copied below: = Change format of SYSDB_NAME attribute for users and groups = Related ticket(s): * https://f

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] CI: Use make check instead of make-check-wrap

2016-03-31 Thread Nikolai Kondrashov
Hi Lukas, On 03/31/2016 02:41 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: ehlo, the 1st patch is prerequisite for the 2nd patch and it also speed up build on rhel6. The second patch simplify some magic in CI script. The idea is fine with me and is welcome. Thank you, Lukas :) I have a couple of comments, tho

[SSSD] [PATCH] CI: Use make check instead of make-check-wrap

2016-03-31 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
ehlo, the 1st patch is prerequisite for the 2nd patch and it also speed up build on rhel6. The second patch simplify some magic in CI script. LS >From e557357fdbf58676bf0a0b1567cbf09ad37feaab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lukas Slebodnik Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 11:17:01 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/

[SSSD] Re: [PATCH] SPEC: Run extra unit tests with epel

2016-03-31 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (18/03/16 17:53), Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >On (17/03/16 23:17), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >>On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 04:12:00PM +0100, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: >>> ehlo, >>> >>> simple patch is attached. >>> >>> LS >> >>Garbage-collecting easy patches untouched for a week or more.. >> >>The patch looks