ehlo,
The first 4 patches are slightly modified version
of Michal's patches. Mostly coding style issues, fixed reports from static
analyzers + fixed small issues which would be fixed as part of review process.
Last two patches are optional improvements which changes ofiginal API.
It was not discu
On (05/05/16 16:28), Michal Židek wrote:
>New patches are attached.
>
>SSSD patch changes:
>-I changed the behavior to only try
>parsing with the new flag when it
>previously failed as proposed by Sumit.
>
>-Existence of the flag is now
>checked in the GPO code, not
>in util.h as Lukas suggested
>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 09:40:47AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (05/05/16 16:28), Michal Židek wrote:
> >New patches are attached.
> >
> >SSSD patch changes:
> >-I changed the behavior to only try
> >parsing with the new flag when it
> >previously failed as proposed by Sumit.
> >
> >-Existenc
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 09:28:26AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> ehlo,
>
> The first 4 patches are slightly modified version
> of Michal's patches. Mostly coding style issues, fixed reports from static
> analyzers + fixed small issues which would be fixed as part of review process.
>
> Last two
On (22/06/16 10:39), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 09:28:26AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> ehlo,
>>
>> The first 4 patches are slightly modified version
>> of Michal's patches. Mostly coding style issues, fixed reports from static
>> analyzers + fixed small issues which would be
On (20/06/16 14:44), Petr Cech wrote:
>Hi,
>
>there is patch for #3023 attached.
>
>Reason for this patch is explained in commit message.
>
>I am open to discussion. In my opinion we don't need to connect sysdb pointer
>with domain structure because it is not used in other upgrade functions too.
>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:52:34AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (22/06/16 10:39), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 09:28:26AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >> ehlo,
> >>
> >> The first 4 patches are slightly modified version
> >> of Michal's patches. Mostly coding style issue
On (22/06/16 11:43), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:52:34AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> On (22/06/16 10:39), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> >On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 09:28:26AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> >> ehlo,
>> >>
>> >> The first 4 patches are slightly modified version
>> >
Hi,
I prepared very simple release notes for ding-libs 0.6.0:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/Releases/DingNotes-0.6.0
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorah
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:48:20AM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> Thank you for review.
>
> Feel free to change/add comments before pushing patches.
I just added a simple comment that the structure field is unused at the
moment.
All patches are pushed to ding-libs master:
* a62db8ede4deba1
A new version of ding-libs was released today!
ding-libs, or "Ding is not GLib" is a a set of helpful libraries used by
projects such as SSSD or gss-proxy.
The tarball can be downloaded from:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/Releases
== Highlights ==
* libini_config
* libini now suppor
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 04:44:05PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 04:15:06PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
> > On 06/21/2016 03:50 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 07:13:10PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Pavel's sssctl tool is at:
On 06/22/2016 11:14 AM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (20/06/16 14:44), Petr Cech wrote:
>Hi,
>
>there is patch for #3023 attached.
>
>Reason for this patch is explained in commit message.
>
>I am open to discussion. In my opinion we don't need to connect sysdb pointer
>with domain structure because
13 matches
Mail list logo
