[SSSD] [PATCH] rename be_acct_req to dp_id_data

To follow other names... From f0cdde7c27f4f907c2413fd4ca3e3e8682532eba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Pavel=20B=C5=99ezina?= Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 11:56:26 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] DP: rename be_acct_req to dp_id_data --- src/providers/ad/ad_id.c

[SSSD] Re: Rethinking debug levels

On 07/14/2016 12:08 PM, Petr Cech wrote: On 07/14/2016 11:35 AM, Michal Židek wrote: On 07/14/2016 10:12 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: We recently focus on providing lots of tracing messages in new code that helps us follow the code, however this makes the debug logs quite big and we usually focus

[SSSD] Re: Rethinking debug levels

On 07/14/2016 11:35 AM, Michal Židek wrote: On 07/14/2016 10:12 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: We recently focus on providing lots of tracing messages in new code that helps us follow the code, however this makes the debug logs quite big and we usually focus only on a specific area or task while

[SSSD] Re: [PATCHES] sssctl: print active server and server list

On 07/13/2016 12:11 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote: On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 02:10:47PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote: Failover patches for the sssctl tool. The output looks like: [master.ipa.pb: ~]$ sudo sssctl domain-status ad.pb Online status: Online Active servers: AD Global Catalog: root-dc.ad.pb AD

[SSSD] Re: Rethinking debug levels

On 07/14/2016 10:12 AM, Pavel Březina wrote: We recently focus on providing lots of tracing messages in new code that helps us follow the code, however this makes the debug logs quite big and we usually focus only on a specific area or task while debugging. A year ago we discussed what we can do

[SSSD] Rethinking debug levels

We recently focus on providing lots of tracing messages in new code that helps us follow the code, however this makes the debug logs quite big and we usually focus only on a specific area or task while debugging. A year ago we discussed what we can do to improve our debugging capabilities but it