[SSSD] [sssd PR#102][opened] Sssctl no case sensitive searches

2016-12-01 Thread mzidek-rh
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/102 Author: mzidek-rh Title: #102: Sssctl no case sensitive searches Action: opened PR body: """ Trying to get rid of branches with smaller patches. Here is one of them. """ To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd

[SSSD] [sssd PR#102][comment] Sssctl no case sensitive searches

2016-12-01 Thread mzidek-rh
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/102 Title: #102: Sssctl no case sensitive searches mzidek-rh commented: """ I need to write an intg test. So the review can wait. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/102#issuecomment-264207778

[SSSD] Re: Design document - Socket-activatable responders

2016-12-01 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 16:04 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:59:37PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 15:22 +0100, Pavel Březina wrote: > > >> On 12/01/2016 02:56 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > >> > O

[SSSD] Re: Design document - Socket-activatable responders

2016-12-01 Thread Jakub Hrozek
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:59:37PM +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 15:22 +0100, Pavel Březina wrote: > >> On 12/01/2016 02:56 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > >> > On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 14:44 +0100, Pavel Březina wrote: > >> >> On

[SSSD] Re: Design document - Socket-activatable responders

2016-12-01 Thread Fabiano Fidêncio
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 15:22 +0100, Pavel Březina wrote: >> On 12/01/2016 02:56 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: >> > On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 14:44 +0100, Pavel Březina wrote: >> >> On 11/24/2016 02:33 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: >> >>> The design page is done

[SSSD] Re: Design document - Socket-activatable responders

2016-12-01 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 15:22 +0100, Pavel Březina wrote: > On 12/01/2016 02:56 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 14:44 +0100, Pavel Březina wrote: > >> On 11/24/2016 02:33 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > >>> The design page is done [0] and it's based on this discussion [1] we > >>> had o

[SSSD] Re: Design document - Socket-activatable responders

2016-12-01 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 15:19 +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Pavel Březina wrote: > > On 11/24/2016 02:33 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > >> > >> The design page is done [0] and it's based on this discussion [1] we > >> had on this very same mailing list. A pull-reque

[SSSD] Re: Design document - Socket-activatable responders

2016-12-01 Thread Pavel Březina
On 12/01/2016 02:56 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 14:44 +0100, Pavel Březina wrote: On 11/24/2016 02:33 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: The design page is done [0] and it's based on this discussion [1] we had on this very same mailing list. A pull-request with the implementation is al

[SSSD] Re: Design document - Socket-activatable responders

2016-12-01 Thread Fabiano Fidêncio
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Pavel Březina wrote: > On 11/24/2016 02:33 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: >> >> The design page is done [0] and it's based on this discussion [1] we >> had on this very same mailing list. A pull-request with the >> implementation is already opened [2]. >> >> [0]: >> ht

[SSSD] Re: Design document - Socket-activatable responders

2016-12-01 Thread Simo Sorce
On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 14:44 +0100, Pavel Březina wrote: > On 11/24/2016 02:33 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > > The design page is done [0] and it's based on this discussion [1] we > > had on this very same mailing list. A pull-request with the > > implementation is already opened [2]. > > > > [0]:

[SSSD] Re: Design document - Socket-activatable responders

2016-12-01 Thread Pavel Březina
On 11/24/2016 02:33 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: The design page is done [0] and it's based on this discussion [1] we had on this very same mailing list. A pull-request with the implementation is already opened [2]. [0]: https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/SocketActivatableResponders [1

[SSSD] [sssd PR#94][comment] Enable {socket,dbus}-activation for responders

2016-12-01 Thread pbrezina
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/94 Title: #94: Enable {socket,dbus}-activation for responders pbrezina commented: """ Squashing is fine, of course. BTW I'm not quite sure if this version contains the uid/gid changes as I see it as parameters in all systemd unit files. In my opinion, eve

[SSSD] [sssd PR#101][closed] SIFP: Fix warning format-security

2016-12-01 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/101 Author: lslebodn Title: #101: SIFP: Fix warning format-security Action: closed To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/101/head:pr101 git checkout pr101 ___

[SSSD] [sssd PR#101][+Pushed] SIFP: Fix warning format-security

2016-12-01 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/101 Title: #101: SIFP: Fix warning format-security Label: +Pushed ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

[SSSD] [sssd PR#101][comment] SIFP: Fix warning format-security

2016-12-01 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/101 Title: #101: SIFP: Fix warning format-security lslebodn commented: """ On (01/12/16 04:25), Pavel Březina wrote: >Obvious ack. > master: * 8618716d6ed4eadca2743eb2dfbbb8d11c4fb22f LS """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/101#

[SSSD] [sssd PR#94][comment] Enable {socket,dbus}-activation for responders

2016-12-01 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/94 Title: #94: Enable {socket,dbus}-activation for responders fidencio commented: """ On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Pavel Březina wrote: > Hi, > > if (ret != EOK) { > #ifdef HAVE_SYSTEMD > if (ret != ENOENT) > #endif > { > DEBUG(SSSDBG_F

[SSSD] [sssd PR#101][comment] SIFP: Fix warning format-security

2016-12-01 Thread pbrezina
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/101 Title: #101: SIFP: Fix warning format-security pbrezina commented: """ Obvious ack. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/101#issuecomment-264160941 ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sss

[SSSD] [sssd PR#101][opened] SIFP: Fix warning format-security

2016-12-01 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/101 Author: lslebodn Title: #101: SIFP: Fix warning format-security Action: opened PR body: """ dbus-1.11.8 added attributes for format string check to few functions in public header files. And therefore there is a warning. src/lib/sifp/sss_sifp_utils.c:

[SSSD] [sssd PR#100][comment] Updation of sssd-ad man page for case when dyndns_refresh_interval < 60 seconds

2016-12-01 Thread centos-ci
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/100 Title: #100: Updation of sssd-ad man page for case when dyndns_refresh_interval < 60 seconds centos-ci commented: """ Can one of the admins verify this patch? """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/100#issuecomment-264158741 __

[SSSD] [sssd PR#100][opened] Updation of sssd-ad man page for case when dyndns_refresh_interval < 60 seconds

2016-12-01 Thread amitkumar50
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/100 Author: amitkumar50 Title: #100: Updation of sssd-ad man page for case when dyndns_refresh_interval < 60 seconds Action: opened PR body: """ https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/2201 """ To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://gi

[SSSD] [sssd PR#100][comment] Updation of sssd-ad man page for case when dyndns_refresh_interval < 60 seconds

2016-12-01 Thread centos-ci
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/100 Title: #100: Updation of sssd-ad man page for case when dyndns_refresh_interval < 60 seconds centos-ci commented: """ Can one of the admins verify this patch? """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/100#issuecomment-264158745 __