[SSSD] Re: [Freeipa-devel] [RFC] Matching and Mapping Certificates

2017-01-05 Thread Jan Cholasta
On 5.1.2017 10:39, Sumit Bose wrote: On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 09:18:47AM +0100, Jan Cholasta wrote: On 18.10.2016 07:34, Jan Cholasta wrote: On 17.10.2016 16:50, Rob Crittenden wrote: Jan Cholasta wrote: Hi, On 13.10.2016 18:52, Sumit Bose wrote: = Issuer specific matching = Although

[SSSD] [sssd PR#100][synchronized] Updation of sssd-ad man page for case when dyndns_refresh_interval < 60 seconds

2017-01-05 Thread amitkumar50
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/100 Author: amitkumar50 Title: #100: Updation of sssd-ad man page for case when dyndns_refresh_interval < 60 seconds Action: synchronized To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/100/head:pr10

[SSSD] [sssd PR#107][comment] WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler

2017-01-05 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107 Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler lslebodn commented: """ On (05/01/17 04:52), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >btw now I'm wondering if the setpgrp should be a separate patch also for >stable branches because I guess the b

[SSSD] [sssd PR#107][-Accepted] WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler

2017-01-05 Thread pbrezina
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107 Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler Label: -Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lis

[SSSD] [sssd PR#107][+Changes requested] WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler

2017-01-05 Thread pbrezina
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107 Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler Label: +Changes requested ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-

[SSSD] [sssd PR#107][comment] WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler

2017-01-05 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107 Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler fidencio commented: """ On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 2:03 PM, lslebodn wrote: > On (05/01/17 04:52), Jakub Hrozek wrote: > >btw now I'm wondering if the setpgrp should be a separate

[SSSD] [sssd PR#107][comment] WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler

2017-01-05 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107 Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler lslebodn commented: """ On (05/01/17 04:52), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >btw now I'm wondering if the setpgrp should be a separate patch also for >stable branches because I guess the b

[SSSD] [sssd PR#107][comment] WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler

2017-01-05 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107 Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler jhrozek commented: """ btw now I'm wondering if the setpgrp should be a separate patch also for stable branches because I guess the bug was present in sssd for quite a long time

[SSSD] [sssd PR#107][comment] WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler

2017-01-05 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107 Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler lslebodn commented: """ On (03/01/17 06:41), fidencio wrote: >Argh, and also: >``` >diff --git a/src/util/util_watchdog.c b/src/util/util_watchdog.c >index 17954d1..77ba705 10064

[SSSD] [sssd PR#107][+Accepted] WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler

2017-01-05 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107 Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler Label: +Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lis

[SSSD] [sssd PR#107][comment] WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler

2017-01-05 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107 Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler jhrozek commented: """ ACK """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107#issuecomment-270630387 ___ sssd-devel m

[SSSD] [sssd PR#107][synchronized] WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler

2017-01-05 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107 Author: fidencio Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler Action: synchronized To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/107/head:pr107 git checkout pr107 F

[SSSD] [sssd PR#107][comment] WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler

2017-01-05 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107 Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler fidencio commented: """ Hmm. I really didn't notice it before but you're right. It ends up killing all explicitly started responders on my setup. Sorry for not having it tested

[SSSD] [sssd PR#107][comment] WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler

2017-01-05 Thread jhrozek
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107 Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler jhrozek commented: """ hmm, it seems I was wrong and at least with systemd (is that the difference?) when we kill the whole process group also the nss and pam responders (that w

[SSSD] Re: [Freeipa-devel] [RFC] Matching and Mapping Certificates

2017-01-05 Thread Sumit Bose
On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 09:18:47AM +0100, Jan Cholasta wrote: > On 18.10.2016 07:34, Jan Cholasta wrote: > > On 17.10.2016 16:50, Rob Crittenden wrote: > > > Jan Cholasta wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > On 13.10.2016 18:52, Sumit Bose wrote: > > > > > = Issuer specific matching = > > >

[SSSD] [sssd PR#118][closed] Don't keep track of automatically generated files

2017-01-05 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/118 Author: fidencio Title: #118: Don't keep track of automatically generated files Action: closed To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/118/head:pr118 git checkout pr118 ___

[SSSD] [sssd PR#118][+Rejected] Don't keep track of automatically generated files

2017-01-05 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/118 Title: #118: Don't keep track of automatically generated files Label: +Rejected ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahos

[SSSD] [sssd PR#118][comment] Don't keep track of automatically generated files

2017-01-05 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/118 Title: #118: Don't keep track of automatically generated files fidencio commented: """ Closing as Rejected as back there in 2014 was decided to keep those files in our tree. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/118#issuecomme