[SSSD] [sssd PR#94][-Changes requested] Enable {socket, dbus}-activation for responders

2017-01-11 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/94 Title: #94: Enable {socket,dbus}-activation for responders Label: -Changes requested ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[SSSD] [sssd PR#94][comment] Enable {socket,dbus}-activation for responders

2017-01-11 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/94 Title: #94: Enable {socket,dbus}-activation for responders fidencio commented: """ New patchset has been pushed. Hopefully all comments have been addressed. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/94#issuecomment-272042851

[SSSD] [sssd PR#121][opened] AUTOFS: Check return of sss_cmd_empty_packet()

2017-01-11 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/121 Author: fidencio Title: #121: AUTOFS: Check return of sss_cmd_empty_packet() Action: opened PR body: """ Just to make the static analyzer happier. Resolves: https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3275 Signed-off-by: Fabiano FidĂȘncio

[SSSD] [sssd PR#120][comment] GPO: Skip GPOs without gPCFunctionalityVersion

2017-01-11 Thread mzidek-rh
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/120 Title: #120: GPO: Skip GPOs without gPCFunctionalityVersion mzidek-rh commented: """ Hi Lukas, I responded to your comments, please tell me what you think about it. Michal """ See the full comment at

[SSSD] [sssd PR#120][synchronized] GPO: Skip GPOs without gPCFunctionalityVersion

2017-01-11 Thread mzidek-rh
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/120 Author: mzidek-rh Title: #120: GPO: Skip GPOs without gPCFunctionalityVersion Action: synchronized To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/120/head:pr120 git checkout pr120 From

[SSSD] [sssd PR#120][comment] GPO: Skip GPOs without gPCFunctionalityVersion

2017-01-11 Thread lslebodn
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/120 Title: #120: GPO: Skip GPOs without gPCFunctionalityVersion lslebodn commented: """ I added few inline questions. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/120#issuecomment-271943969 ___

[SSSD] Re: sssd-1.14.3 milestone cleanup

2017-01-11 Thread Lukas Slebodnik
On (11/01/17 16:31), Jakub Hrozek wrote: >Hi, > >despite new development happening in the sssd-1-15 branch (aka master), >there are still too many tickets in the 1.14.3 milestone. The tickets >should be moved out to current milestones unless someone is really >working on them. > >These are: >*

[SSSD] [sssd PR#120][comment] GPO: Skip GPOs without gPCFunctionalityVersion

2017-01-11 Thread mzidek-rh
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/120 Title: #120: GPO: Skip GPOs without gPCFunctionalityVersion mzidek-rh commented: """ To test manually, you can create a testing GPO normally and then unset the parmeter (for example using the ADSI Edit). """ See the full comment at

[SSSD] [sssd PR#120][opened] GPO: Skip GPOs without gPCFunctionalityVersion

2017-01-11 Thread mzidek-rh
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/120 Author: mzidek-rh Title: #120: GPO: Skip GPOs without gPCFunctionalityVersion Action: opened PR body: """ We falsely stopped GPO processing when Group Policy Container in AD did not contain gPCFunctionalityVersion. Such GPOs should be ignored by

[SSSD] sssd-1.14.3 milestone cleanup

2017-01-11 Thread Jakub Hrozek
Hi, despite new development happening in the sssd-1-15 branch (aka master), there are still too many tickets in the 1.14.3 milestone. The tickets should be moved out to current milestones unless someone is really working on them. These are: * https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/3063 - add

[SSSD] Handling of offline requests in sssd-1-13 and older

2017-01-11 Thread Jakub Hrozek
Hi, there was a customer complaining about fail over not reconnecting as fast with sssd-1-13 as it did with sssd-1-14. The issue they were seeing was that if sssd was offline, but the server came back up, it still took sssd the full offline timeout cycle to attempt to reconnect, even though we