URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/94
Title: #94: Enable {socket,dbus}-activation for responders
fidencio commented:
"""
@lslebodn:
Okay, I was able to reproduce both issues, they have been fixed and a new
series has been updated.
I do believe the crash you saw (even I'm not able to reprod
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/94
Title: #94: Enable {socket,dbus}-activation for responders
fidencio commented:
"""
@lslebodn:
About kill -9 not restarting the responder ... it's already fixed locally by
the my patches covering @jhrozek review.
About the second one, I'll dig into it
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/94
Title: #94: Enable {socket,dbus}-activation for responders
fidencio commented:
"""
@lslebodn:
About kill -9 not restarting the responder ... it's already fixed locally by
the my patches covering @jhrozek review.
About the second one, I'll dig into it
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/94
Title: #94: Enable {socket,dbus}-activation for responders
lslebodn commented:
"""
And it seems that is also possible to add invalid service to this option.
Previously it was not possible
e.g.
```
sed -i 's/services = nss, pam/services = nss, pam, dp/g'
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/94
Title: #94: Enable {socket,dbus}-activation for responders
lslebodn commented:
"""
As part of different testing I found out that services are not restarted if
they die.
There send `kill -9` to some responder which is listed in "services" option.
Tested
On 01/17/2017 11:15 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
Hi,
I started working on the design page for subdomain
configuration in server mode. It is located here:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/SubdomConf
The implementation details
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Michal Židek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I started working on the design page for subdomain
> configuration in server mode. It is located here:
> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/SubdomConf
>
> The implementation details and how to debug sections will
>
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/126
Author: lslebodn
Title: #126: ldap_child: Fix use after free
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
In case on any krb5 related error, we tried to send string
interpretation of krb5 error tb parrent in prepare_response.
However, we cannot use global krb5 contex
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/94
Title: #94: Enable {socket,dbus}-activation for responders
fidencio commented:
"""
@lslebodn:
Can you gimme a reproducer (even if it's not reliable)?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/94#issuecomment-273052238
__
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/94
Title: #94: Enable {socket,dbus}-activation for responders
lslebodn commented:
"""
I still can see the crash in latest version. It was not related to the quoted
change
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/94#issuecomment-27304
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/94
Title: #94: Enable {socket,dbus}-activation for responders
lslebodn commented:
"""
I still can see the crash in latest version. It was not related to the quoted
change
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/94#issuecomment-27304
11 matches
Mail list logo
