URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/160
Author: jhrozek
Title: #160: Fix files provider reallocation logic
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
Fixes a potential crash in the files provider. A test and a detailed
explanation are included in the commit message.
"""
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/159
Author: sumit-bose
Title: #159: pam: use authtok from PAM stack if available
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
With this patch the behavior of pam_sss is slightly changed to be more
similar to the behavior of other PAM modules. Currently pam_sss expects
tha
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/137
Title: #137: Initial pkinit support
sumit-bose commented:
"""
Thank you for review and testing. I fixed the issue with changing the expired
password and reordered the patches so that sss_authtok_set_sc is defined before
it is used.
"""
See the full c
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/137
Title: #137: Initial pkinit support
Label: -Changes requested
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/137
Author: sumit-bose
Title: #137: Initial pkinit support
Action: synchronized
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd pull/137/head:pr137
git checkout pr137
From c93632dce2d4bb18a36b43216335255f7
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/139
Title: #139: Initial revision of sssd pytest framework
jhrozek commented:
"""
@mrniranjan @lslebodn it seems that this patch set got a bit stuck. Are the
major issues the pep8 warnings and the whitespace issues? If yes, can
@mrniranjan respin the patc
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/70
Title: #70: check_duplicate: check name member before using it
jhrozek commented:
"""
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 01:02:45AM -0800, lslebodn wrote:
> On (20/02/17 14:43), fidencio wrote:
> >Can we have this one pushed by @sumit-bose and @jhrozek review?
> >
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/70
Title: #70: check_duplicate: check name member before using it
lslebodn commented:
"""
On (20/02/17 14:43), fidencio wrote:
>Can we have this one pushed by @sumit-bose and @jhrozek review?
>
I would still prefer to see an integration test.
Feel free to