URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/270
Title: #270: Subdomains direct integration
mzidek-rh commented:
"""
Btw, we fixed practically the same issue in IPA subdomains code (from users
perspective). The code for direct integration is completely different, but
maybe we could reuse the same is
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/270
Author: mzidek-rh
Title: #270: Subdomains direct integration
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
Note: I know the commit message misses an issue number. I will add it tomorrow
when I clone the BZ. However this should not block the review.
"""
To pull the PR
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/269
Title: #269: Add support for ActiveDirectory's logonHours restrictions
fidencio commented:
"""
ok to test
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/269#issuecomment-300797835
___
sssd-dev
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/269
Author: NWilson
Title: #269: Add support for ActiveDirectory's logonHours restrictions
Action: edited
Changed field: body
Original value:
"""
This is a straightforward patch for denying access to a user when the user is
not permitted to access their
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/269
Title: #269: Add support for ActiveDirectory's logonHours restrictions
centos-ci commented:
"""
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/269#issuecomment-300793133
_
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/269
Title: #269: Add support for ActiveDirectory's logonHours restrictions
centos-ci commented:
"""
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/269#issuecomment-300793139
_
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/269
Author: NWilson
Title: #269: Add support for ActiveDirectory's logonHours restrictions
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
This is a straightforward patch for denying access to a user when the user is
not permitted to access their account due to logonHours r
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/259
Title: #259: RESPONDER: Also populate cr_domains when initializing the
responders
pbrezina commented:
"""
Open the sockets but postpone reading from them?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/259#issuecomment-300757695
__
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/268
Title: #268: pam_sss: add support for SSS_PAM_CERT_INFO_WITH_HINT
abbra commented:
"""
I opened RFE https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/3396 to discuss details of this.
I believe "sending potentially bogus data to SSSD" is not an argument -- any
process
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/259
Title: #259: RESPONDER: Also populate cr_domains when initializing the
responders
sumit-bose commented:
"""
jfyi, I think my suggested patch is not the right solution either because it
will delay the startup time especially when the system is offline.
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/268
Title: #268: pam_sss: add support for SSS_PAM_CERT_INFO_WITH_HINT
sumit-bose commented:
"""
> Still, why you cannot make that decision without an option's help? Sorry, I
> don't see a difference -- why by seeing a certificate pam_sss cannot defer
> de
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/268
Title: #268: pam_sss: add support for SSS_PAM_CERT_INFO_WITH_HINT
abbra commented:
"""
Still, why you cannot make that decision without an option's help? Sorry, I
don't see a difference -- why by seeing a certificate `pam_sss` cannot defer
decision to
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/268
Title: #268: pam_sss: add support for SSS_PAM_CERT_INFO_WITH_HINT
sumit-bose commented:
"""
>Is there a technical reason sssd cannot discover what to do without
>allow_missing_name option to pam_sss? I'd prefer to avoid modifying PAM config
>files...
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/268
Title: #268: pam_sss: add support for SSS_PAM_CERT_INFO_WITH_HINT
abbra commented:
"""
Is there a technical reason sssd cannot discover what to do without
`allow_missing_name` option to pam_sss? I'd prefer to avoid modifying PAM
config files...
"""
S
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/268
Author: sumit-bose
Title: #268: pam_sss: add support for SSS_PAM_CERT_INFO_WITH_HINT
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
This patchset got lost when I prepared the certificate mapping patch set.
Applications like gdm with enabled Smartcard support will try t
15 matches
Mail list logo