Hi,
1.15.4 will be released by the end of this months in a time-based
fashion. But obviously, the milestone is too big, so we need to decide
where do we push the tickets to.
I added tags to the tickets with my proposed cleanup:
- move to 1.16:
https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/roadmap?status
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/352
Title: #352: logging: Removing duplicate log message
Label: +Changes requested
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahost
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/351
Title: #351: NSS: Look for name attribute also in nss_cmd_getsidbyid
lslebodn commented:
"""
On (21/08/17 03:11), fidencio wrote:
>@lslebodn ... seems that nss_cmd_getsidbyid() is the only function using
>object_by_id().
>
>Knowing that, I'd also sugge
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/351
Title: #351: NSS: Look for name attribute also in nss_cmd_getsidbyid
lslebodn commented:
"""
On (21/08/17 03:11), fidencio wrote:
>@lslebodn ... seems that nss_cmd_getsidbyid() is the only function using
>object_by_id().
>
>Knowing that, I'd also sugge
Hi Michal and sssd-devel,
one of the RFEs that keeps coming up for SSSD is to provide a sort of an
'attestation report' for SSSD. Mostly the request is about printing who
can access this client machine.
I know that we fetch all the HBAC rules for a client with the IPA
provider, but Michal, you me
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/241
Title: #241: FleetCommander Integration
fidencio commented:
"""
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Pavel Březina
wrote:
> I think it is better to set the method only when needed. Try this diff
> instead of your patch:
>
> --- a/src/providers/data_provi
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/241
Title: #241: FleetCommander Integration
pbrezina commented:
"""
I think it is better to set the method only when needed. Try this diff instead
of your patch:
```c
--- a/src/providers/data_provider/dp_target_auth.c
+++ b/src/providers/data_provider/dp_
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/351
Title: #351: NSS: Look for name attribute also in nss_cmd_getsidbyid
fidencio commented:
"""
@lslebodn ... seems that nss_cmd_getsidbyid() is the only function using
object_by_id().
Knowing that, I'd also suggest to take a look at
responder/common/ca
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/352
Title: #352: logging: Removing duplicate log message
centos-ci commented:
"""
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/352#issuecomment-323704150
___
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/352
Title: #352: logging: Removing duplicate log message
centos-ci commented:
"""
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/352#issuecomment-323704157
___
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/352
Author: amitkumar50
Title: #352: logging: Removing duplicate log message
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
Duplicate log messages were getting logged if trust relationship
breaks for some reason from AD. That causes lot spam in syslog.
This PR removes dupli
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/351
Title: #351: NSS: Look for name attribute also in nss_cmd_getsidbyid
lslebodn commented:
"""
Another solution would be soften requirement for attribute NAME in
`cache_req_search_ncache_filter`
@pbrezina what do you think :-)
"""
See the full comment
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/351
Author: lslebodn
Title: #351: NSS: Look for name attribute also in nss_cmd_getsidbyid
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
We always check negcache after getting data from backend since commit
4c09cd008967c5c0ec358dc658ffc6fc1cef2697 because we usually do have
13 matches
Mail list logo
