URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/578
Author: amitkumar50
Title: #578: proxy: proxy_child hardening
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
proxy_child will call chdir("/"), umask(022)
and reset the environment with clearenv().
The --domain argument to be sanitized.
Resolves: https://pagure.io/SSSD
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/578
Title: #578: proxy: proxy_child hardening
centos-ci commented:
"""
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/578#issuecomment-391241246
___
sssd-d
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/578
Title: #578: proxy: proxy_child hardening
centos-ci commented:
"""
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/578#issuecomment-391241247
___
sssd-d
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/577
Title: #577: ipa: Use fqname on selinux_child_setup
fidencio commented:
"""
CI: http://vm-031.${abc}/logs/job/89/36/summary.html
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/577#issuecomment-391008923
_
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/577
Title: #577: ipa: Use fqname on selinux_child_setup
fidencio commented:
"""
With the patch:
J:2496100
Without the patch:
J:2495991
At least according to those tests no regression has been introduced. And,
considering they're reliable, I've gotten e
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/577
Author: fidencio
Title: #577: ipa: Use fqname on selinux_child_setup
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
Although there was a comment saying that pam_selinux needs the username
in the same format getpwnam() would return it, it doesn't seem to be
the case anym
On 05/22/2018 11:35 AM, Chris Kowalczyk wrote:
On 05/22/2018 10:56 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On 22 May 2018, at 10:24, Chris Kowalczyk wrote:
Hello All,
I have been trying to run sssd intgcheck, but to not success. Could
you help me with it?
Generally, I've been performing the following steps
On 05/22/2018 10:56 AM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On 22 May 2018, at 10:24, Chris Kowalczyk wrote:
Hello All,
I have been trying to run sssd intgcheck, but to not success. Could you help me
with it?
Generally, I've been performing the following steps:
autoreconf -if
./configure --disable-cifs-idma
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/576
Title: #576: MAN: Fix the title of the session recording man page
Label: +Accepted
___
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedora
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/576
Title: #576: MAN: Fix the title of the session recording man page
fidencio commented:
"""
Acked by Amit! I'm adding the Accepted label as per his Ack!
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/576#issuecomment-390917244
___
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/574
Title: #574: cache_req: Don't force a fqname for files provider output
fidencio commented:
"""
I have updated the commit message based on the discussion I had with @pbrezina
and @jhrozek.
From the updated commit message:
"
As the most common scena
> On 22 May 2018, at 10:24, Chris Kowalczyk wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> I have been trying to run sssd intgcheck, but to not success. Could you help
> me with it?
> Generally, I've been performing the following steps:
>
> autoreconf -if
> ./configure --disable-cifs-idmap-plugin --without-samba
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/574
Author: fidencio
Title: #574: cache_req: Don't force a fqname for files provider output
Action: synchronized
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd pull/574/head:pr574
git checkout pr574
From
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/576
Author: jhrozek
Title: #576: MAN: Fix the title of the session recording man page
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
s/sudo/session-recording/
"""
To pull the PR as Git branch:
git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd
git fetch ghsssd pull/576/hea
> On 21 May 2018, at 23:58, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:32 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 21 May 2018, at 21:39, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
>>>
>>> People,
>>>
>>> I've been trying to debug a SELinux issue related to the domain
>>> resolution order.
>>>
>>>
Hello All,
I have been trying to run sssd intgcheck, but to not success. Could you
help me with it?
Generally, I've been performing the following steps:
autoreconf -if
./configure --disable-cifs-idmap-plugin --without-samba \
--without-nfsv4-idmapd-plugin --without-secrets \
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/575
Author: jhrozek
Title: #575: DP/LDAP: Only increase the initgrTimestamp when the full
initgroups DP request finishes
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
An initgroups request for an AD user consists of two parts - resolving the
AD user, which internally call
On 05/21/2018 03:51 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2018-05-21 at 11:52 +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
On 05/18/2018 09:50 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2018-05-18 at 16:11 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 02:33:32PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
Hi folks,
I sent a mail about new sbu
18 matches
Mail list logo
