[SSSD] [sssd PR#599][comment] MAN: Give information regarding priority of ldap lookup

2018-06-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/599 Title: #599: MAN: Give information regarding priority of ldap lookup fidencio commented: """ ok to test """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/599#issuecomment-397525664 ___ sssd-devel

[SSSD] [sssd PR#599][comment] MAN: Give information regarding priority of ldap lookup

2018-06-14 Thread centos-ci
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/599 Title: #599: MAN: Give information regarding priority of ldap lookup centos-ci commented: """ Can one of the admins verify this patch? """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/599#issuecomment-397516339 ___

[SSSD] [sssd PR#599][opened] MAN: Give information regarding priority of ldap lookup

2018-06-14 Thread amitkumar50
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/599 Author: amitkumar50 Title: #599: MAN: Give information regarding priority of ldap lookup Action: opened PR body: """ This PR provides information about priority of lookup similar to as provided by function select_principal_from_keytab(). Resolves: ht

[SSSD] [sssd PR#599][comment] MAN: Give information regarding priority of ldap lookup

2018-06-14 Thread centos-ci
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/599 Title: #599: MAN: Give information regarding priority of ldap lookup centos-ci commented: """ Can one of the admins verify this patch? """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/599#issuecomment-397516340 ___

[SSSD] [sssd PR#592][closed] Responder: simplify if-else structure in sss_dp_get_account_msg()

2018-06-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/592 Author: amitkumar50 Title: #592: Responder: simplify if-else structure in sss_dp_get_account_msg() Action: closed To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/592/head:pr592 git checkout pr592

[SSSD] [sssd PR#592][+Pushed] Responder: simplify if-else structure in sss_dp_get_account_msg()

2018-06-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/592 Title: #592: Responder: simplify if-else structure in sss_dp_get_account_msg() Label: +Pushed ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@l

[SSSD] [sssd PR#592][-Accepted] Responder: simplify if-else structure in sss_dp_get_account_msg()

2018-06-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/592 Title: #592: Responder: simplify if-else structure in sss_dp_get_account_msg() Label: -Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...

[SSSD] [sssd PR#592][comment] Responder: simplify if-else structure in sss_dp_get_account_msg()

2018-06-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/592 Title: #592: Responder: simplify if-else structure in sss_dp_get_account_msg() fidencio commented: """ master: 1038473 """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/592#issuecomment-397391372 __

[SSSD] [sssd PR#579][-Accepted] krb5 locator: add support for multiple addresses and sub-domains

2018-06-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/579 Title: #579: krb5 locator: add support for multiple addresses and sub-domains Label: -Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@

[SSSD] [sssd PR#579][+Pushed] krb5 locator: add support for multiple addresses and sub-domains

2018-06-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/579 Title: #579: krb5 locator: add support for multiple addresses and sub-domains Label: +Pushed ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@li

[SSSD] [sssd PR#579][closed] krb5 locator: add support for multiple addresses and sub-domains

2018-06-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/579 Author: sumit-bose Title: #579: krb5 locator: add support for multiple addresses and sub-domains Action: closed To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/579/head:pr579 git checkout pr579 __

[SSSD] [sssd PR#579][comment] krb5 locator: add support for multiple addresses and sub-domains

2018-06-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/579 Title: #579: krb5 locator: add support for multiple addresses and sub-domains fidencio commented: """ master: efae950 9f68324 c1fbc6b 2124275 cc79227 d91661e 4759a48 f28d995 """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull

[SSSD] [sssd PR#598][comment] intg: Do not hardcode nsslibdir

2018-06-14 Thread mzidek-rh
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/598 Title: #598: intg: Do not hardcode nsslibdir mzidek-rh commented: """ The patch looks good. Just waiting for the CI to finish. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/598#issuecomment-397234926 ___

[SSSD] [sssd PR#598][comment] intg: Do not hardcode nsslibdir

2018-06-14 Thread ChrisKowalczyk
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/598 Title: #598: intg: Do not hardcode nsslibdir ChrisKowalczyk commented: """ @mzidek-rh , @fidencio , @jhrozek , yes, I re-run everything again by myself and I can confirm that PR works as expected. Thanks guys! """ See the full comment at https://gith

[SSSD] [sssd PR#598][comment] intg: Do not hardcode nsslibdir

2018-06-14 Thread mzidek-rh
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/598 Title: #598: intg: Do not hardcode nsslibdir mzidek-rh commented: """ @fidencio Thanks for the info. I will try to do the review before today's call. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/598#issuecomment-397219141

[SSSD] [sssd PR#598][comment] intg: Do not hardcode nsslibdir

2018-06-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/598 Title: #598: intg: Do not hardcode nsslibdir fidencio commented: """ So, the tmate session + phone talk happened this morning and the patch does fix the issues both @ChrisKowalczyk and myself faced on Leap 15.0. @mzidek-rh, please, feel free to review