[SSSD] [sssd PR#629][+postponed until sssd 2.0] ldap: remove parallel requests from rfc2307bis

2018-08-08 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/629 Title: #629: ldap: remove parallel requests from rfc2307bis Label: +postponed until sssd 2.0 ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@li

[SSSD] [sssd PR#629][opened] ldap: remove parallel requests from rfc2307bis

2018-08-08 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/629 Author: fidencio Title: #629: ldap: remove parallel requests from rfc2307bis Action: opened PR body: """ As this branch of code is not well tested, we've decided to just nuke it and, in the future, spend more time on improving the performance for the

[SSSD] [sssd PR#620][comment] Add pam_cert_pam_services option

2018-08-08 Thread abbra
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/620 Title: #620: Add pam_cert_pam_services option abbra commented: """ I'm also fine with @lslebodn patch """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/620#issuecomment-411374966 ___ sssd-devel m

[SSSD] [sssd PR#620][comment] Add pam_cert_pam_services option

2018-08-08 Thread abbra
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/620 Title: #620: Add pam_cert_pam_services option abbra commented: """ I think +service style is better. Sorry for slow answers, I'm at the conference this week. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/620#issuecomment-411373283 ___

[SSSD] [sssd PR#620][comment] Add pam_cert_pam_services option

2018-08-08 Thread sumit-bose
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/620 Title: #620: Add pam_cert_pam_services option sumit-bose commented: """ @lslebodn created a PR with his old patch at https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/pull-request/3799. @abbra, would you agree that the +- style makes the configuration easier or do you see