On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 07:44:31PM +0100, Per-Erik Persson wrote:
I will come back with an example certificate that fails.
This seems to be more complicated than I first anticipated.
The same certificate is working on older code based on the mozilla-nss
libray.
You could reject the patch.
Hi,
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/5367
Title: #5367: pam: add pam_sss_gss module for gssapi authentication
frozencemetery commented:
"""
> the patches are not yet ready to be reviewed again.
Okay, just ping me when you want another review and I'll take a look.
"""
See the full comment at
I will come back with an example certificate that fails.
This seems to be more complicated than I first anticipated.
The same certificate is working on older code based on the mozilla-nss
libray.
You could reject the patch.
Den ons 28 okt. 2020 10:24sumit-bose <
sssd-github-notificat...@fedorahos
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/5378
Author: ikerexxe
Title: #5378: sbus: change socket file name to sbus-dp_DOMAIN
Action: opened
PR body:
"""
Socket file name changes from sbus-dp_DOMAIN_PID to sbus-dp_DOMAIN to
avoid leaving orphaned socket files when sssd crashes. As there is only
o
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/5376
Title: #5376: Update cert.c
sumit-bose commented:
"""
Hi,
can you give a bit more details about the purpose of this pull request?
Currently the `0` is added unconditionally, do you have a case where this does
not work as expected?
bye,
Sumit
"""
S
