[SSSD] [sssd PR#472][comment] Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA

2018-01-09 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/472 Title: #472: Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA fidencio commented: """ @sumit-bose, thanks for your review. Patch set has been updated with: - Making use of the missing attribut

[SSSD] [sssd PR#472][synchronized] Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA

2018-01-09 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/472 Author: fidencio Title: #472: Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA Action: synchronized To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull

[SSSD] [sssd PR#480][+Accepted] MAN: Describe the constrains of ipa_server_mode better in the man page

2018-01-03 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/480 Title: #480: MAN: Describe the constrains of ipa_server_mode better in the man page Label: +Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel

[SSSD] [sssd PR#480][-Changes requested] MAN: Describe the constrains of ipa_server_mode better in the man page

2018-01-03 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/480 Title: #480: MAN: Describe the constrains of ipa_server_mode better in the man page Label: -Changes requested ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to s

[SSSD] [sssd PR#480][comment] MAN: Describe the constrains of ipa_server_mode better in the man page

2018-01-03 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/480 Title: #480: MAN: Describe the constrains of ipa_server_mode better in the man page fidencio commented: """ I've double-check with @justin-stephenson on IRC and he said: 18:30 justin-time: may we get your final word here: htt

[SSSD] [sssd PR#480][comment] MAN: Describe the constrains of ipa_server_mode better in the man page

2018-01-03 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/480 Title: #480: MAN: Describe the constrains of ipa_server_mode better in the man page fidencio commented: """ retest this please """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/p

[SSSD] [sssd PR#480][comment] MAN: Describe the constrains of ipa_server_mode better in the man page

2018-01-03 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/480 Title: #480: MAN: Describe the constrains of ipa_server_mode better in the man page fidencio commented: """ I'm adding back the "Changes Requested" label as per @amitkumar50's request. """ See the

[SSSD] [sssd PR#480][+Changes requested] MAN: Describe the constrains of ipa_server_mode better in the man page

2018-01-03 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/480 Title: #480: MAN: Describe the constrains of ipa_server_mode better in the man page Label: +Changes requested ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to s

[SSSD] [sssd PR#472][comment] Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA

2018-01-03 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/472 Title: #472: Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA fidencio commented: """ @sumit-bose, thanks for the suggestion. Just for the record, what I've done in order to set

[SSSD] [sssd PR#472][-Changes requested] Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA

2018-01-03 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/472 Title: #472: Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA Label: -Changes requested ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an ema

[SSSD] [sssd PR#484][comment] SDAP: skip builtin AD groups in sdap_save_grpmem()

2018-01-02 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/484 Title: #484: SDAP: skip builtin AD groups in sdap_save_grpmem() fidencio commented: """ CI: http://vm-031.${abc}/logs/job/82/83/summary.html """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/p

[SSSD] [sssd PR#484][comment] SDAP: skip builtin AD groups in sdap_save_grpmem()

2018-01-02 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/484 Title: #484: SDAP: skip builtin AD groups in sdap_save_grpmem() fidencio commented: """ Okay. I've fired a CI build with this patch rebased atop of #378 and no warnings have been introduced. """ See the full comme

[SSSD] [sssd PR#484][comment] SDAP: skip builtin AD groups in sdap_save_grpmem()

2018-01-02 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/484 Title: #484: SDAP: skip builtin AD groups in sdap_save_grpmem() fidencio commented: """ Ah, I forgot to mention, @lslebodn feel free to just ignore my comment, remove the "Changes Requested" label and take over the review if

[SSSD] [sssd PR#486][+Accepted] TOOLS: Fix typo: exist -> exists

2018-01-02 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/486 Title: #486: TOOLS: Fix typo: exist -> exists Label: +Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

[SSSD] [sssd PR#486][comment] TOOLS: Fix typo: exist -> exists

2018-01-02 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/486 Title: #486: TOOLS: Fix typo: exist -> exists fidencio commented: """ Adding the "Accepted" label as per @lslebodn's review. """ See the full comment at https://gith

[SSSD] [sssd PR#484][comment] SDAP: skip builtin AD groups in sdap_save_grpmem()

2018-01-02 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/484 Title: #484: SDAP: skip builtin AD groups in sdap_save_grpmem() fidencio commented: """ > Can you see some warnings? > Could you explain the reason? On the system that I use I haven't seen any warning. Unfortunately #378 has

[SSSD] [sssd PR#486][opened] TOOLS: Fix typo: exist -> exists

2018-01-02 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/486 Author: fidencio Title: #486: TOOLS: Fix typo: exist -> exists Action: opened PR body: """ I've noticed the typo while working on #472 """ To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.c

[SSSD] [sssd PR#472][comment] Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA

2018-01-02 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/472 Title: #472: Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA fidencio commented: """ I have failed to try to reproduce the issue with `sss_override` + `sss_ssh_authorizedkeys`. `sss_ove

[SSSD] [sssd PR#476][comment] IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName

2018-01-01 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/476 Title: #476: IPA: Handle empty nisDomainName fidencio commented: """ Patch looks good, although I don't know how to reproduce the issue. Would be possible to add steps to reproduce (either here or in the pagure issue)? ps: I'

[SSSD] [sssd PR#484][+Changes requested] SDAP: skip builtin AD groups in sdap_save_grpmem()

2018-01-01 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/484 Title: #484: SDAP: skip builtin AD groups in sdap_save_grpmem() Label: +Changes requested ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists

[SSSD] [sssd PR#481][comment] gcc warnings: Getting rid of -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn

2018-01-01 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/481 Title: #481: gcc warnings: Getting rid of -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn fidencio commented: """ > "But still I am not sure should -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn go in > Makefile.am or elsewhere.." @amitkumar50, please, t

[SSSD] [sssd PR#400][opened] PAM: Avoid overwriting pam_status in _lookup_by_cert_done()

2017-12-24 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/400 Author: fidencio Title: #400: PAM: Avoid overwriting pam_status in _lookup_by_cert_done() Action: opened PR body: """ In case add_pam_cert_response() failed pam_status has to be set to PAM_AUTHINFO_UNAVAIL. Although it's done

[SSSD] [sssd PR#481][comment] gcc warnings: Getting rid of -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn

2017-12-18 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/481 Title: #481: gcc warnings: Getting rid of -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn fidencio commented: """ This PR depends on #378 and any warning removed should: - Pass our internal CI (with patches from #378 applied) - The manywarnings file

[SSSD] [sssd PR#480][+Changes requested] MAN: Describe the constrains of ipa_server_mode better in the man page

2017-12-15 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/480 Title: #480: MAN: Describe the constrains of ipa_server_mode better in the man page Label: +Changes requested ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to s

[SSSD] [sssd PR#480][comment] MAN: Describe the constrains of ipa_server_mode better in the man page

2017-12-15 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/480 Title: #480: MAN: Describe the constrains of ipa_server_mode better in the man page fidencio commented: """ Patch is good to me and, please, do **not** wait for my review to proceed with this bug (as I'll be out for a few weeks

[SSSD] [sssd PR#479][+Accepted] MAN: Document that auth and access IPA and AD providers rely on id_provider being set to the same type

2017-12-15 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/479 Title: #479: MAN: Document that auth and access IPA and AD providers rely on id_provider being set to the same type Label: +Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubsc

[SSSD] [sssd PR#479][comment] MAN: Document that auth and access IPA and AD providers rely on id_provider being set to the same type

2017-12-15 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/479 Title: #479: MAN: Document that auth and access IPA and AD providers rely on id_provider being set to the same type fidencio commented: """ This patch is good as it is, no need of a debug message IMO. """ See the full

[SSSD] [sssd PR#478][+Accepted] ifp: use realloc in ifp_list_ctx_remaining_capacity()

2017-12-15 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/478 Title: #478: ifp: use realloc in ifp_list_ctx_remaining_capacity() Label: +Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedor

[SSSD] [sssd PR#478][comment] ifp: use realloc in ifp_list_ctx_remaining_capacity()

2017-12-15 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/478 Title: #478: ifp: use realloc in ifp_list_ctx_remaining_capacity() fidencio commented: """ Although CI has not fully passed, the problem with rhel-7 is due to a missing dep in the buildroot. CI: http://vm-031.${abc}/logs/job/82/

[SSSD] [sssd PR#478][comment] ifp: use realloc in ifp_list_ctx_remaining_capacity()

2017-12-15 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/478 Title: #478: ifp: use realloc in ifp_list_ctx_remaining_capacity() fidencio commented: """ @sumit-bose, patch works fine and behaves accordingly to expected. I have one request about the commit message, though. May you mention in the

[SSSD] [sssd PR#378][comment] [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code

2017-12-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/378 Title: #378: [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code fidencio commented: """ @pbrezina, @jhrozek: This PR has been updated and is ready to be reviewed & possibly merged. I've opened two issues related to this PR: http

[SSSD] [sssd PR#378][comment] [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code

2017-12-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/378 Title: #378: [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code fidencio commented: """ CI: http://vm-031.abc.idm.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com/logs/job/82/70/summary.html """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/s

[SSSD] [sssd PR#477][synchronized] SYSDB: Return EOK in case a non-fatal issue happened

2017-12-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/477 Author: fidencio Title: #477: SYSDB: Return EOK in case a non-fatal issue happened Action: synchronized To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/477/head:pr477 git checkout pr477 From

[SSSD] [sssd PR#378][comment] [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code

2017-12-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/378 Title: #378: [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code fidencio commented: """ I've fired a CI build and I'm waiting for its results. """ See the full comment at https://github.

[SSSD] [sssd PR#378][comment] [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code

2017-12-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/378 Title: #378: [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code fidencio commented: """ @pbrezina, @jhrozek: This PR has been updated and is read to be reviewed & possibly merged. I've opened two issues related to this PR: http

[SSSD] [sssd PR#378][synchronized] [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code

2017-12-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/378 Author: fidencio Title: #378: [RFC] Use GNULIB's compiler warning code Action: synchronized To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/378/head:pr378 git checkout pr378

[SSSD] [sssd PR#477][opened] SYSDB: Return EOK in case a non-fatal issue happened

2017-12-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/477 Author: fidencio Title: #477: SYSDB: Return EOK in case a non-fatal issue happened Action: opened PR body: """ There may be the case where we aren't able to merge the timestamps from the fast ts db, which are treated as non-fata

[SSSD] [sssd PR#379][comment] CI: Enable pep8 check

2017-12-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379 Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check lslebodn commented: """ cigarette """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379#issuecomment-351685924 ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.

[SSSD] [sssd PR#379][comment] CI: Enable pep8 check

2017-12-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379 Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check fidencio commented: """ Well, when a PR is not reviewed and the comments come with: "Coding style was never a priority and I cannot see a reason why core developer need to sped a time with fixing

[SSSD] [sssd PR#379][closed] CI: Enable pep8 check

2017-12-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379 Author: fidencio Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check Action: closed To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/379/head:pr379 git checkout pr379

[SSSD] [sssd PR#379][comment] CI: Enable pep8 check

2017-12-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379 Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check fidencio commented: """ As per @lslebodn's comments I understand that SSSD project has **no** interest on this PR at the moment. I've opened https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/3605 and I&#x

[SSSD] [sssd PR#379][+Rejected] CI: Enable pep8 check

2017-12-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379 Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check Label: +Rejected ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

[SSSD] [sssd PR#474][+Accepted] p11_child: properly check results of CERT_VerifyCertificateNow

2017-12-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/474 Title: #474: p11_child: properly check results of CERT_VerifyCertificateNow Label: +Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@li

[SSSD] [sssd PR#474][comment] p11_child: properly check results of CERT_VerifyCertificateNow

2017-12-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/474 Title: #474: p11_child: properly check results of CERT_VerifyCertificateNow fidencio commented: """ CI: http://vm-031.abc.idm.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com/logs/job/82/60/summary.html """ See the full comment at https:/

[SSSD] [sssd PR#379][comment] CI: Enable pep8 check

2017-12-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379 Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check fidencio commented: """ Hmm. And seems that I will have to re-work these patches as more new issues have been added meanwhile this patch was stuck. :-/ We **really** have to have a better way to han

[SSSD] [sssd PR#379][comment] CI: Enable pep8 check

2017-12-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379 Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check fidencio commented: """ I have updated the patch set and fired a CI build. I'd really appreciate if we can have this one pushed as soon as our internal CI passes and then avoid having to fi

[SSSD] [sssd PR#379][-Changes requested] CI: Enable pep8 check

2017-12-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379 Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check Label: -Changes requested ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

[SSSD] [sssd PR#379][synchronized] CI: Enable pep8 check

2017-12-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/379 Author: fidencio Title: #379: CI: Enable pep8 check Action: synchronized To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/379/head:pr379 git checkout pr379 From

[SSSD] [sssd PR#474][comment] p11_child: properly check results of CERT_VerifyCertificateNow

2017-12-14 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/474 Title: #474: p11_child: properly check results of CERT_VerifyCertificateNow fidencio commented: """ Ack! spoore has verified that this patch properly solves the issue. I'm waiting for our internal CI results ... ""&qu

[SSSD] [sssd PR#472][comment] Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA

2017-12-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/472 Title: #472: Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA fidencio commented: """ I have updated the patchset adding a patch solving the issue on the client side as well. I'm keeping

[SSSD] [sssd PR#472][synchronized] Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA

2017-12-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/472 Author: fidencio Title: #472: Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA Action: synchronized To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull

[SSSD] [sssd PR#473][comment] Revert "intg: Disable add_remove tests"

2017-12-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/473 Title: #473: Revert "intg: Disable add_remove tests" fidencio commented: """ Adding the "Accepted" label as per mine and @mzidek-rh's review. """ See the full comment at https

[SSSD] [sssd PR#473][+Accepted] Revert "intg: Disable add_remove tests"

2017-12-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/473 Title: #473: Revert "intg: Disable add_remove tests" Label: +Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

[SSSD] [sssd PR#471][-Changes requested] Fix a few typos

2017-12-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/471 Title: #471: Fix a few typos Label: -Changes requested ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

[SSSD] [sssd PR#471][comment] Fix a few typos

2017-12-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/471 Title: #471: Fix a few typos fidencio commented: """ I have updated the patch set dropping the patch that was fixing the indentation. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/p

[SSSD] [sssd PR#471][synchronized] Fix a few typos

2017-12-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/471 Author: fidencio Title: #471: Fix a few typos Action: synchronized To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/471/head:pr471 git checkout pr471 From c76ead5f5d8e7426768cbffd2f9cdfec93538ab6

[SSSD] [sssd PR#473][comment] Revert "intg: Disable add_remove tests"

2017-12-13 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/473 Title: #473: Revert "intg: Disable add_remove tests" fidencio commented: """ Hmm. Seems okay by me. @mzidek-rh said in the past he'd spend some time trying to figure out this issue and here I'm wondering whether he

[SSSD] [sssd PR#472][comment] Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA

2017-12-12 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/472 Title: #472: Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA fidencio commented: """ And actually I found out that my solution is incomplete and it only works on the server side. :-/ Mor

[SSSD] [sssd PR#472][comment] Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA

2017-12-12 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/472 Title: #472: Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA fidencio commented: """ Let me add the "Changes Requested" label till I have the answer. """ See the

[SSSD] [sssd PR#472][+Changes requested] Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA

2017-12-12 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/472 Title: #472: Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA Label: +Changes requested ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an ema

[SSSD] [sssd PR#472][comment] Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA

2017-12-12 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/472 Title: #472: Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA fidencio commented: """ That's a good question, @lslebodn, although I don't have the answer for that right now. I'

[SSSD] [sssd PR#472][opened] Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA

2017-12-12 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/472 Author: fidencio Title: #472: Remove the 'sshPublicKey' attribute from the cache when it's removed from IPA Action: opened PR body: """ Those two patches provide a fix for https://pagure.io/SSSD/sssd/issue/3602. When

[SSSD] [sssd PR#471][opened] Fix a few typos

2017-12-12 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/471 Author: fidencio Title: #471: Fix a few typos Action: opened PR body: """ Those typos where found while navigating through the code ... """ To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/

[SSSD] [sssd PR#468][comment] enable lookup of "sshPublicKey" for active directory

2017-12-10 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/468 Title: #468: enable lookup of "sshPublicKey" for active directory fidencio commented: """ ok to test """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/468#issuecomment-350641800 __

[SSSD] [sssd PR#464][comment] SYSDB: Properly handle name/gid override when using domain resolution order

2017-12-09 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/464 Title: #464: SYSDB: Properly handle name/gid override when using domain resolution order fidencio commented: """ @lslebodn, wow, thanks for the very good explanation. I actually misread your first comment as "tests" inst

[SSSD] [sssd PR#463][comment] cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req

2017-12-09 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/463 Title: #463: cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req fidencio commented: """ @amitkumar50, CI has passed (that's the content of the link) and the PR is waiting for @jhrozek's review. """ See the full comme

[SSSD] [sssd PR#464][comment] SYSDB: Properly handle name/gid override when using domain resolution order

2017-12-08 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/464 Title: #464: SYSDB: Properly handle name/gid override when using domain resolution order fidencio commented: """ Sure thing. I'd appreciate some guidance on how to write a valid test for this case, considering it involves a

[SSSD] [sssd PR#466][+Accepted] IPA: Include SYSDB_OBJECTCATEGORY, not OBJECTCLASS in cache search results

2017-12-08 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/466 Title: #466: IPA: Include SYSDB_OBJECTCATEGORY, not OBJECTCLASS in cache search results Label: +Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-d

[SSSD] [sssd PR#466][comment] IPA: Include SYSDB_OBJECTCATEGORY, not OBJECTCLASS in cache search results

2017-12-08 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/466 Title: #466: IPA: Include SYSDB_OBJECTCATEGORY, not OBJECTCLASS in cache search results fidencio commented: """ In an IPA master: - Without the patch: ``` [root@master7 ~]# getent passwd administra...@ad.ff administra...@ad.ff:*:3788

[SSSD] [sssd PR#466][-Accepted] IPA: Include SYSDB_OBJECTCATEGORY, not OBJECTCLASS in cache search results

2017-12-08 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/466 Title: #466: IPA: Include SYSDB_OBJECTCATEGORY, not OBJECTCLASS in cache search results Label: -Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-d

[SSSD] [sssd PR#466][comment] IPA: Include SYSDB_OBJECTCATEGORY, not OBJECTCLASS in cache search results

2017-12-08 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/466 Title: #466: IPA: Include SYSDB_OBJECTCATEGORY, not OBJECTCLASS in cache search results fidencio commented: """ So let me remove the accepted label and properly do the manual test as this is only reproduced in the server side. &q

[SSSD] [sssd PR#467][comment] nss-idmap: allow NULL result in *_timeout calls

2017-12-08 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/467 Title: #467: nss-idmap: allow NULL result in *_timeout calls fidencio commented: """ CI: http://vm-031.${abc}/logs/job/82/41/summary.html Please, whoever pushes this patch add also @abbra as reviewer. """ See the full

[SSSD] [sssd PR#467][+Accepted] nss-idmap: allow NULL result in *_timeout calls

2017-12-08 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/467 Title: #467: nss-idmap: allow NULL result in *_timeout calls Label: +Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahoste

[SSSD] [sssd PR#467][comment] nss-idmap: allow NULL result in *_timeout calls

2017-12-08 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/467 Title: #467: nss-idmap: allow NULL result in *_timeout calls fidencio commented: """ I'm firing a CI build. Code-wise it looks good and **does** make sense to allow the result argument to be NULL as in some cases the caller is ju

[SSSD] [sssd PR#466][+Accepted] IPA: Include SYSDB_OBJECTCATEGORY, not OBJECTCLASS in cache search results

2017-12-08 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/466 Title: #466: IPA: Include SYSDB_OBJECTCATEGORY, not OBJECTCLASS in cache search results Label: +Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-d

[SSSD] [sssd PR#466][comment] IPA: Include SYSDB_OBJECTCATEGORY, not OBJECTCLASS in cache search results

2017-12-08 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/466 Title: #466: IPA: Include SYSDB_OBJECTCATEGORY, not OBJECTCLASS in cache search results fidencio commented: """ Hmm. Seems that I can't reproduce the issue with my "One-way trust" setup. OTOH, the issue has been confi

[SSSD] [sssd PR#466][comment] IPA: Include SYSDB_OBJECTCATEGORY, not OBJECTCLASS in cache search results

2017-12-07 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/466 Title: #466: IPA: Include SYSDB_OBJECTCATEGORY, not OBJECTCLASS in cache search results fidencio commented: """ CI:http://vm-031.${abc}/logs/job/82/40/summary.html I'll run a manual test Tomorrow before adding the "Accepted&

[SSSD] [sssd PR#465][comment] p11_child: make sure OCSP checks are done

2017-12-07 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/465 Title: #465: p11_child: make sure OCSP checks are done fidencio commented: """ CI: http://vm-031.${abc}/logs/job/82/39/summary.html """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/p

[SSSD] [sssd PR#465][+Accepted] p11_child: make sure OCSP checks are done

2017-12-07 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/465 Title: #465: p11_child: make sure OCSP checks are done Label: +Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

[SSSD] [sssd PR#466][comment] IPA: Include SYSDB_OBJECTCATEGORY, not OBJECTCLASS in cache search results

2017-12-07 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/466 Title: #466: IPA: Include SYSDB_OBJECTCATEGORY, not OBJECTCLASS in cache search results fidencio commented: """ I've fired a CI build and will add the "Accepted" label as soon as I get the results. """

[SSSD] [sssd PR#466][comment] IPA: Include SYSDB_OBJECTCATEGORY, not OBJECTCLASS in cache search results

2017-12-07 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/466 Title: #466: IPA: Include SYSDB_OBJECTCATEGORY, not OBJECTCLASS in cache search results fidencio commented: """ Looks fine by me. Do you want to have an ACK from @sumit-bose as well or just mine is fine? """

[SSSD] [sssd PR#463][comment] cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req

2017-12-07 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/463 Title: #463: cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req fidencio commented: """ CI: http://vm-031.${abc}/logs/job/82/37/summary.html """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/p

[SSSD] [sssd PR#465][comment] p11_child: make sure OCSP checks are done

2017-12-07 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/465 Title: #465: p11_child: make sure OCSP checks are done fidencio commented: """ Patch looks fine by me and has been tested by Scott Poore (who must be added as reviewer as well) when this patch gets pushed. I've just fired a CI bu

[SSSD] [sssd PR#463][comment] cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req

2017-12-07 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/463 Title: #463: cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req fidencio commented: """ Okay, after talking to @amitkumar50 on IRC, he gave me the permission to force push my changes on his branch. New patchset has been updated and conf

[SSSD] [sssd PR#463][synchronized] cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req

2017-12-07 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/463 Author: amitkumar50 Title: #463: cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req Action: synchronized To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/463/head:pr463 git checkout pr463 From 7bdcb54201d

[SSSD] [sssd PR#463][comment] cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req

2017-12-07 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/463 Title: #463: cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req fidencio commented: """ After the last patchset pushed to master this branch has a lot of conflicts. In order to speed up the review process, I've rebased @amitkumar50'

[SSSD] [sssd PR#464][comment] SYSDB: Properly handle name/gid override when using domain resolution order

2017-12-05 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/464 Title: #464: SYSDB: Properly handle name/gid override when using domain resolution order fidencio commented: """ Coverity: passed without issues! Internal CI: also passed without issues ... http://vm-031.${abc}/logs/job/82/16/summar

[SSSD] [sssd PR#464][comment] SYSDB: Properly handle name/gid override when using domain resolution order

2017-12-05 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/464 Title: #464: SYSDB: Properly handle name/gid override when using domain resolution order fidencio commented: """ Coverity: passed without issues! Internal CI: waiting for rawhide results, but all the other passed without issues! &q

[SSSD] [sssd PR#464][synchronized] SYSDB: Properly handle name/gid override when using domain resolution order

2017-12-05 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/464 Author: fidencio Title: #464: SYSDB: Properly handle name/gid override when using domain resolution order Action: synchronized To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/464/head:pr464 git

[SSSD] [sssd PR#464][synchronized] SYSDB: Properly handle name/gid override when using domain resolution order

2017-12-05 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/464 Author: fidencio Title: #464: SYSDB: Properly handle name/gid override when using domain resolution order Action: synchronized To pull the PR as Git branch: git remote add ghsssd https://github.com/SSSD/sssd git fetch ghsssd pull/464/head:pr464 git

[SSSD] [sssd PR#464][opened] SYSDB: Properly handle name/gid override when using domain resolution order

2017-12-05 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/464 Author: fidencio Title: #464: SYSDB: Properly handle name/gid override when using domain resolution order Action: opened PR body: """ When using name/gid override together with domain resolution order the mpg name/gid may be returned

[SSSD] [sssd PR#436][comment] subdomains: Remove code only used in tests

2017-12-05 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/436 Title: #436: subdomains: Remove code only used in tests fidencio commented: """ @amitkumar50, you don't have to **remove** tests from test_ad_create_1way_trust_options and test_ad_create_2way_trust_options. What you'll have

[SSSD] [sssd PR#410][comment] IPA: sanitize name in override search filter - Backport to SSSD-1.13

2017-12-03 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/410 Title: #410: IPA: sanitize name in override search filter - Backport to SSSD-1.13 fidencio commented: """ > Maybe, I do not know whether you used the same of IPA server for testing > master and 1.13 but version of ipa-client sho

[SSSD] [sssd PR#463][comment] cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req

2017-12-03 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/463 Title: #463: cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req fidencio commented: """ Opening new PR. > I have wrongly commited an unrelevant PR on old and even long back, rebased > it several times. I need to do bit of work on How

[SSSD] [sssd PR#463][comment] cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req

2017-12-03 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/463 Title: #463: cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req fidencio commented: """ I'm removing the "Changes Requested" label and the patch has been update by @amitkumar50 and I don't have any more comments to add (so

[SSSD] [sssd PR#463][-Changes requested] cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req

2017-12-03 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/463 Title: #463: cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req Label: -Changes requested ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedora

[SSSD] [sssd PR#463][comment] cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req

2017-12-03 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/463 Title: #463: cache: Check for max_id/min_id in cache_req fidencio commented: """ ok to test """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/463#issuecomment-348881798

[SSSD] [sssd PR#458][comment] overrides: fixes for sysdb_invalidate_overrides()

2017-12-01 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/458 Title: #458: overrides: fixes for sysdb_invalidate_overrides() fidencio commented: """ Thanks! Added the "Accepted" label! """ See the full comment at https://github.com/S

[SSSD] [sssd PR#458][+Accepted] overrides: fixes for sysdb_invalidate_overrides()

2017-12-01 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/458 Title: #458: overrides: fixes for sysdb_invalidate_overrides() Label: +Accepted ___ sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahos

[SSSD] [sssd PR#458][comment] overrides: fixes for sysdb_invalidate_overrides()

2017-12-01 Thread fidencio
URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/458 Title: #458: overrides: fixes for sysdb_invalidate_overrides() fidencio commented: """ Manual test went fine and our internal CI passed without issues. CI: http://vm-031.${abc}/logs/job/82/02/summary.html """

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >