-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/06/2010 09:22 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 12/06/2010 09:00 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Thanks for the review, new version attached.
>
>>> This rebased version should apply cleanly on top of master + "account
>>> expired rules". Sorry for an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/06/2010 09:00 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
>>> Thanks for the review, new version attached.
>
>> This rebased version should apply cleanly on top of master + "account
>> expired rules". Sorry for any inconveniences.
Ack.
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 02:38:27PM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 08:19:08AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 12/03/2010 05:19 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:19:02AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 08:19:08AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 12/03/2010 05:19 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:19:02AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On 11/29/2010 09:15 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/2010 05:19 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:19:02AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 11/29/2010 09:15 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
this patch adds a ldap_chpass_uri config option as requested in trac
tick
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:19:02AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/29/2010 09:15 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this patch adds a ldap_chpass_uri config option as requested in trac
> > ticket #680. The first patch just removes an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/29/2010 09:15 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch adds a ldap_chpass_uri config option as requested in trac
> ticket #680. The first patch just removes an unused struct member.
>
> bye,
> Sumit
>
Patch 0001: Ack.
Patch 0002: Nack. It
Hi,
this patch adds a ldap_chpass_uri config option as requested in trac
ticket #680. The first patch just removes an unused struct member.
bye,
Sumit
From 85633d25fa9747df00842907d00b5052ef00056d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Bose
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:24:49 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2