On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 09:41 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 14:19 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the ldap_init_fd() patch introduced another regression with ldaps URIs.
> > This patch should fix it.
>
> The patch looks good. It's a bit unfortunate that it's a syn
On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 14:19 +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the ldap_init_fd() patch introduced another regression with ldaps URIs.
> This patch should fix it.
The patch looks good. It's a bit unfortunate that it's a synchronous
action, but we can resolve that later. Please open an upstream ti
Hi,
the ldap_init_fd() patch introduced another regression with ldaps URIs.
This patch should fix it.
bye,
Sumit
From 227a661dc28dafabef6edea61054ddf10986857b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Bose
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 11:37:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Call ldap_install_tls() on ldaps connecti
