Hi,
I found this on a system where systemd-devel was not installed. Since we
already know that systemd is available at this stage of the configure
run I wonder if AC_MSG_NOTICE is ok or if AC_MSG_ERROR asking to install
systemd-devel would be better?
bye,
Sumit
From
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 01:00:07PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
I found this on a system where systemd-devel was not installed. Since we
already know that systemd is available at this stage of the configure
run I wonder if AC_MSG_NOTICE is ok or if AC_MSG_ERROR asking to install
On 09/17/2013 01:26 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 01:00:07PM +0200, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
I found this on a system where systemd-devel was not installed. Since we
already know that systemd is available at this stage of the configure
run I wonder if AC_MSG_NOTICE is ok or if
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 03:23:48PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
But currently there is no way to enable/disable the support without
having the right library installed. Do you think there would be value in
a switch like this or the autodetection is OK?
I don't see a point to disable it on
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 03:23:48PM +0200, Pavel Březina wrote:
ACK to this patch, we can decide about the option later.
Ack from me as well.
Pushed to master.
___
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
