On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:37:39AM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:05:25AM +0200, Ondrej Kos wrote:
> > On 06/09/2013 01:36 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >>entry, service, enabled are "incremented version of" pointer line, which
> > >>is
> > >>>not NULL.
> > >>>
> > >>>ACK
>
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:05:25AM +0200, Ondrej Kos wrote:
> On 06/09/2013 01:36 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >>entry, service, enabled are "incremented version of" pointer line, which is
> >>>not NULL.
> >>>
> >>>ACK
> >>>
> >>>LS
> >Can we also remove the assignments of entry,service and enabled to
On 06/09/2013 01:36 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
entry, service, enabled are "incremented version of" pointer line, which is
>not NULL.
>
>ACK
>
>LS
Can we also remove the assignments of entry,service and enabled to NULL
now since they will always be non-NULL in the while() iteration?
Sure, new pat
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 07:03:25PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (07/06/13 14:38), Ondrej Kos wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Attached patch fixes the following issue:
> >https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1971
> >
> >This is coverity bug, CIDs: 11851,11852,11853
> >
> >I tested this with NSCD configur
On (07/06/13 14:38), Ondrej Kos wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Attached patch fixes the following issue:
>https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1971
>
>This is coverity bug, CIDs: 11851,11852,11853
>
>I tested this with NSCD configuration file malformed in various ways.
>
>The first thing is, NSCD won't even start,
Hi,
Attached patch fixes the following issue:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1971
This is coverity bug, CIDs: 11851,11852,11853
I tested this with NSCD configuration file malformed in various ways.
The first thing is, NSCD won't even start, when nscd.conf doesn't meet
the specifications
