Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Fixes for proxy provider

2009-11-12 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/11/2009 12:41 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 11/11/2009 09:22 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: >> Hi, > >> this patch fixes a bug in the procy provider and makes >> proxy_pam_target a mandatory option, because we do not ship a matching >> pam configurat

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Fixes for proxy provider

2009-11-11 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/11/2009 09:22 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: > Hi, > > this patch fixes a bug in the procy provider and makes > proxy_pam_target a mandatory option, because we do not ship a matching > pam configuration for the old default. > > bye, > Sumit > > > > _

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Fixes for proxy provider

2009-11-11 Thread Sumit Bose
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 09:55:25AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/11/2009 09:22 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: > > Hi, > > > > this patch fixes a bug in the procy provider and makes > > proxy_pam_target a mandatory option, because we do not ship

Re: [SSSD] [PATCH] Fixes for proxy provider

2009-11-11 Thread Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/11/2009 09:22 AM, Sumit Bose wrote: > Hi, > > this patch fixes a bug in the procy provider and makes > proxy_pam_target a mandatory option, because we do not ship a matching > pam configuration for the old default. > > bye, > Sumit > > > > _

[SSSD] [PATCH] Fixes for proxy provider

2009-11-11 Thread Sumit Bose
Hi, this patch fixes a bug in the procy provider and makes proxy_pam_target a mandatory option, because we do not ship a matching pam configuration for the old default. bye, Sumit >From d5e97eca44bca580189f9bfd5371937c22d397a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sumit Bose Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:1