-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/23/2009 09:18 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> But the patch looks good.
>
> ACK
>
Pushed to master
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 21:00 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
>
> The attached patch does most of the above. There is no option "auto"
> because I think it might be more confusing than without. Also there is
> not option "ldap_pwd_policy", because if there is a server side policy
> the client cannot ignore
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:23:17AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 14:06 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this patch should fix #279 by ignoring the shadow attributes by
> > default.
>
> I was thinking about this and I think I don't want to go down this way.
> While autom
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 18:38 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
>
> Does this patch do anything about not returning "x" in the password
> field of the passwd map
NM. I just saw the patch for #266. And commented on it.
b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 14:06 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch should fix #279 by ignoring the shadow attributes by
> default.
Does this patch do anything about not returning "x" in the password
field of the passwd map if the shadow object class is not present in the
user's LDAP entry
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:23:17AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 14:06 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this patch should fix #279 by ignoring the shadow attributes by
> > default.
>
> I was thinking about this and I think I don't want to go down this way.
> While autom
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 14:06 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this patch should fix #279 by ignoring the shadow attributes by
> default.
I was thinking about this and I think I don't want to go down this way.
While automatic discovery of the expiration attributes is nice, I think
it is an issue.
Hi,
this patch should fix #279 by ignoring the shadow attributes by
default.
bye,
Sumit
>From 8bcd2646e948a1f05b279196a4e6f4350aa5d5a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Bose
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:56:57 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Ignore shadow attributes
---
server/man/sssd-ldap.5.xml
