On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 21:00 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
The attached patch does most of the above. There is no option auto
because I think it might be more confusing than without. Also there is
not option ldap_pwd_policy, because if there is a server side policy
the client cannot ignore it.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/23/2009 09:18 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
But the patch looks good.
ACK
Pushed to master
- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:23:17AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 14:06 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
this patch should fix #279 by ignoring the shadow attributes by
default.
I was thinking about this and I think I don't want to go down this way.
While automatic
Hi,
this patch should fix #279 by ignoring the shadow attributes by
default.
bye,
Sumit
From 8bcd2646e948a1f05b279196a4e6f4350aa5d5a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sumit Bose sb...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:56:57 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Ignore shadow attributes
---
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 14:06 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
this patch should fix #279 by ignoring the shadow attributes by
default.
I was thinking about this and I think I don't want to go down this way.
While automatic discovery of the expiration attributes is nice, I think
it is an issue.
I
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 09:23:17AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 14:06 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
this patch should fix #279 by ignoring the shadow attributes by
default.
I was thinking about this and I think I don't want to go down this way.
While automatic
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 14:06 +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
Hi,
this patch should fix #279 by ignoring the shadow attributes by
default.
Does this patch do anything about not returning x in the password
field of the passwd map if the shadow object class is not present in the
user's LDAP entry? Or
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 18:38 -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
Does this patch do anything about not returning x in the password
field of the passwd map
NM. I just saw the patch for #266. And commented on it.
b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
